IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783A61295D1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:22:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzdlWgs4G4Td for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E72AC12947B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:22:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cRqWI-0004n6-Ok for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:19:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:19:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cRqWI-0004n6-Ok@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cRqWE-0004lP-QG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:19:02 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cRqW8-0005p6-OW for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:18:57 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v23so35132734qtb.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:18:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TcS5HyxjZhVVLS04prSt0hKlmWNQ0w3yf3LAsrwxOSc=; b=Avno9GIfom7fAYBF2v+x7s+NjYFtiC4KCdQydantEGjZY0gNekfU3V09vnb94SRlWG qka5nf1/iMBAeLRUFiP91wMFE+XCCe52QXWR7L+LiZ1Uk/p62fSXtyg45Hx29ldyLLhq wa67H/SW1AtIHmLAg40sa+VuUaBgfmwLgytO0N7SZBbDp6r7W7aljcIV86cghrElTU3w K4hXLoeDoqdnKswnRDUTI9eNAFlwIQgPX7vJC6AgposPZpdQMEx5TCNX/xUVbkZAflOl w3aufdubyX+6iqwx1VLlg6VLnuU168qYlfYmerTmyCaX2yONBICh+YZeRfhu9ZIKUePZ GB3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TcS5HyxjZhVVLS04prSt0hKlmWNQ0w3yf3LAsrwxOSc=; b=gXfRNZbjn7/5gWywOgvyuukikyI1kpMp7dZs/TZpi6eNMf1fdlrq+sN2gro85+d8e3 YeoQQkLj1f28D4RtYR/FDt5p5MTLgIZ8Y1fAKDPAbwpufrZUhY6yNrkwwwDu6eopBTq1 1VCPO8PFkZ/MdlTUrzuTgTu0kf2lcH93Uu23tF6BUr3FVwXAzriBJvpHdk0jM3SWkViT N1xR9+EOvvP0nQhM3VRjBVuvUmPP3hdg/q/Mfec6n3XjEyY6VrD8Z07KnQ3heaQ/KvzO qHh5CDZuUyfeLMrfWl8jsGh7/8C3eph0Ur4fP2uybxcBihYAuV5pSB/qpYBsQk+3zzLz 4gsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLHItmssQv8W3OqweTOV1PoTFOuVIYkGNlMy+uKf4UUrpt+J//BucJvZosSPUquG+fJSFVry8C55T3N3A==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.247 with SMTP id l52mr10219153qtb.144.1484270310601; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:18:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:18:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNr==BmizwUPKaMZq__UckfM5bAJ0w15=A-R1xrtZ+JxjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNr==BmizwUPKaMZq__UckfM5bAJ0w15=A-R1xrtZ+JxjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:18:30 +1300
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVw9K4DiRySgSjbYcxkEyAqxU9DU3dw4e4+vpEk6ff5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.177; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.230, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cRqW8-0005p6-OW 5b3ab953ca56240388ab3d12e884bdde
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVw9K4DiRySgSjbYcxkEyAqxU9DU3dw4e4+vpEk6ff5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33281
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 13 January 2017 at 11:10, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I need to direct your attention to one of just two open issues with the
> 5987bis document (Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header
> Field Parameters), which deals with the intended status of the eventual RFC.

Proposed Standard would seem to be sufficient.  I would think that
being MORE mature than HTTP would be unrealistic, so that limits us to
PS.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email