END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpretation
"Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com> Wed, 24 July 2013 23:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A7911E8123 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKgYX0ymx+QA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86411E811E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V2848-0003PE-PB for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V2848-0003PE-PB@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sakulkar@akamai.com>) id 1V283w-0003OQ-Cm for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:40 +0000
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com ([96.6.114.112]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sakulkar@akamai.com>) id 1V283v-0004JA-QE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:40 +0000
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26905483FE for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay03.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay03.akamai.com [172.27.8.26]) by prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DDA483FB for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ustx2ex-cashub.dfw01.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.73]) by prod-mail-relay03.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAD22FD5E for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:01:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.88]) by ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.73]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:01:09 -0500
From: "Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com>
To: 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:01:07 -0500
Thread-Topic: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpretation
Thread-Index: Ac6Iwa71rAQdqbpwRcSCJd/ddHkwXg==
Message-ID: <CE15AAC3.1A91%sakulkar@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE15AAC31A91sakulkarakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=96.6.114.112; envelope-from=sakulkar@akamai.com; helo=prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.451, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V283v-0004JA-QE a559d3b946cfc38fe066375ef1061751
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpretation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CE15AAC3.1A91%25sakulkar@akamai.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18904
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
What happens to session level flow control when a WINDOW_UPDATE frame with END_FLOW_CONTROL flag set is received with a particular stream id (stream_id other than "0")? E.g. Session Window Size: 64kb Stream Window Size: 64kb, stream_id: 2 Receive WINDOW_UPDATE with END_FLOW_CONTROL bit set, stream_id:2 Should the sender follow the session level flow control or ignore flow control for stream_id:2? - Saurabh
- Re: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interp… Patrick McManus
- END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpreta… Kulkarni, Saurabh
- Re: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interp… Kulkarni, Saurabh
- Re: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interp… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa