IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4542D1294AD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjEwrX7zZY3b for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4123126D74 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bttd2-0005FD-4S for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:45:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:45:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bttd2-0005FD-4S@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1bttcu-0004dg-0x for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:45:36 +0000
Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1bttcq-0003Ag-Sw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:45:34 +0000
Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x79so33325303lff.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O+mFZZ8Arv65gxBzo0whgNYJPInyPlP4LFgJsyjdgPg=; b=pWfhpjo2Ud4p+m9f9nVaxbVp7Q9z/EhLR8DjnJWc8ILxHjnhjcyWVt05mXzqzI9tUE NBBz5NhNz35CSXshyofMje3lqvMVXz0wfA5CJqASX0hJEI/5dn2+F69X+9vAvOUMXHW/ 3pAdOfu3YGHDrScxWHi6/UcGxBeHtQO3kMzTaDAQ2yFIedq0IYugOKEuHNu2nzVbhATV UpOu8joyDcxcTo0FgTbVYuKdQmmjlSjw6sxMf+SQLHBAM9fyPxKJjE3VGOcHIHOCcx3T LdrGBEqubQiYCljDO8iZjZZD03uDLdpYijuqmhnDvZ1su0tRMHE/A9Ccx92Ln5TbScR9 FPnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O+mFZZ8Arv65gxBzo0whgNYJPInyPlP4LFgJsyjdgPg=; b=dwFqDiNj3cmxwAdEMQTTwPilz3CukSPNGIZy6Nhz+VbUzATdB0W/Tdd/6gl/qpFzvx qnlgLpAbf/JYEUMcvbGnK3oUi1NaAixXAWV0B+VCMuJ6ttGe4/vikTcPRv/aZVWasx0f tKTmz022Hqx7a0NcIucOR0OxQn7kFkL/ujyus/bIOKhNZRDS/zPSKXgxIuynYuljXBhL Y/J1kbG4deoKAjFh4Ez3VBcruEOQJxMu9dmpRUsNflIT+AmhD/X1UOHIy1nkf6piOGgW BeL1Zaj5to4yNYw5vLd1qD6ZzK8a+hRlKBHu/BA7zjFyy91bnqtLsude3E7Ob8FuKKtK gBMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmLKjqRR9s7ZfK6DQzhGf/10Kcg1U/lSCMX9nmgfe0UgXujbay1L61njp9lgzE7vWTsy8HLmJuEcaFXzh0O
X-Received: by 10.25.34.11 with SMTP id i11mr2071605lfi.119.1476179105890; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.20.230 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4dbd894c-4389-a246-8a75-16a103f5858e@gmx.de>
References: <147614675047.31404.6416168532325888959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com> <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net> <CAKXHy=f=tNi5mft02y_rhg9tbP8J5wDLSR1=MmJeys+7tUWC0A@mail.gmail.com> <4dbd894c-4389-a246-8a75-16a103f5858e@gmx.de>
From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:44:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113aa9103ba677053e93bb26"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.53; envelope-from=mkwst@google.com; helo=mail-lf0-f53.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.654, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.336, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bttcq-0003Ag-Sw 442ee67538b7fdee42b6567858d5825b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32557
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 2016-10-11 10:24, Mike West wrote:
>
>> Mark filed https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/243, and I
>> fixed it
>> in https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/79fc688f3b9
>> 5febb9b53e2500221697cab563f8a.
>> I'm sure we'll find more formatting issues over the next week or so that
>> arose from the port from the flat text file to Markdown, so I'll hold
>> off on publishing a -01 draft until those shake out.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -mike
>>
>
> FWIW, I believe this change:
>
> Old:
>
>   token = <token, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2>
>
> New:
>
>   token = token
>             ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2
>
> is a bad idea; it makes the ABNF invalid.
>

I made this change because of a lint warning that the `sane-cookie-date`
definition in the same block was too long. What's a reasonable way of
marking both of these up consistently without overflowing the allotted
width?

-mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email