IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 01 October 2015 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CCA1B29F5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RVbidDDdMc_9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C041B29F4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZhWYo-0006s2-0v for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 05:37:42 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 05:37:42 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZhWYo-0006s2-0v@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZhWWw-00056k-Iq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 05:35:46 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZhWWu-0000Gd-UZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 05:35:46 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7359822E1F4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:35:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <1C7436D4-D1EF-454C-BC14-E8C00165AA2E@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:35:18 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D107F92F-F930-44AE-945A-9170389DFCC4@mnot.net>
References: <1C7436D4-D1EF-454C-BC14-E8C00165AA2E@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.211, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZhWWu-0000Gd-UZ 476c12b6efa80375cd404176c24c8e3b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D107F92F-F930-44AE-945A-9170389DFCC4@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30297
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Everyone,

We're belatedly adopting this; Julian asked for a breather while he finished other work, and now he's ready to commence.

Cheers,


> On 31 Mar 2015, at 3:08 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> We discussed this document in Dallas:
>  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reschke-rfc5987bis>
> 
> Based on the feedback received, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product, with a target of Proposed Standard.
> 
> I've discussed it with our Area Director, who agrees that it's a reasonable thing for us to do.
> 
> Since this is a bis effort with a primary aim of aligning with RFC723x, I think we can do this relatively quickly, with a target of going to IETF LC by Prague.
> 
> Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of the week.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status