Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 28 May 2013 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CBA11E80F8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gC1gfATxN8F3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E4D11E80FB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UhO3F-0005by-QH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:51:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:51:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UhO3F-0005by-QH@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UhO31-0005ar-Jc for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:50:59 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UhO2v-0001uA-6E for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:50:59 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so5911398wgg.16 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VdHBMZABNpcjipOJCkwHN6piatBJl4YLUSXFyVx15FY=; b=XxRFWSHZnryxTwsB850m2/84OUdNN+Hbl/V9WanhZxB7l1IY+XGTfxFyl8Plti7UGw dlBxfTGsm/DCXfC6pC3RwhwLm5ckPaWiiWrZJtBzWmswsbo8YpdzJTLLLL7Y5bZdOVs4 BAMEE3y3DlMg2miiwIfuQw/yZMY7WOX+UARaZs7V2ukx7mg8t5X3OqWZcBqhv/Eaqmgh +AQS282SCmkv55y5LF3gOqWOGiy+wCsACpLdqkO2/c0eTh6qvz+r+fTATpwVj8lMXmtC z3wiWVEvAxeggQu21iJMzBtBHwKpBooQcVRTVNq60tiEKtJaEFuxgDzlHKrtNqkPQiNX Ob3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.87.33 with SMTP id u1mr13193746wiz.34.1369763427035; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.250.10 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbdUSLTN1YJDkigfqvMJw7hUh4Uv+CYSsFETn6N+EQ0NdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbfX_H_7dwM7ExL5qJgpV5JN1NYyv9tqnu_E23qGk63mWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhDhoS+BNknRnYLAOXfWzumcjkWnQnM=NkNM8oqqE=atw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNqkuY5qtOzFz5J0v1F1_n8HmFY9J==sXMs_9tDrTTE=cg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhZb_ScYZ=F8ypGkXkX=3oK+4TnyWOtuN_FNkZqqhbZLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbeAwrT15QKn5kL0=w+V0zBgObe_pOzT-NxbwSrZ_RyA+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNd95pXcPM1OiG2qjOyXKV80noh2frdEbORwe6HxsgeK3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfOWdaOVeVSmnrqUtHM5F8=xjLauDBoRbpijWsWxyK+rw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_g892Cr1B8GtN01j1GArU0+Mkoya2UAAb893ZrfKdyeEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNe4=hVsm3sNerAdELECHz_2m8aWOLK-Kif-JVz_G=HyKw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_jaDNWyZyxsWVQ2YuBG8kuZjo1KovmBVfa2d9vVYb56dg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNd0AZEDXvTD7uvEgFK-4GRShj9tEcam0C68t4S_ySTNUw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_i84tPbrVZgE-0uLeZs5UB0wY2PLn=R9V74ZUe+0TyfiA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNcWfdgtW+-6tpXgcAPZSNHOdBuoMXLY4nPyf4YoLTeotg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_gV4YS6FVMiQ0rzDEHCYnOJdeGftY4Z0nm18qfaQBdofA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNfBoh6wcqTUHfHPhbf8zZ4Vj=i2Lg4bEG5wcyuUwz60eQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_j8CX9vddtogsjz80uN=kv6vE7V1dJqEuJdTtGO64PYyw@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbdUSLTN1YJDkigfqvMJw7hUh4Uv+CYSsFETn6N+EQ0NdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:50:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXWZ3pGhOugkTBQG2=0J8PdTkeefqToCsrGGQVV=rv=gQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, =?UTF-8?B?Q2hhbldpbGxpYW0o6ZmI5pm65piMKQ==?= <willchan@chromium.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.49; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f49.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.669, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UhO2v-0001uA-6E 4a6a729ae346fceb5ffef29ba137aa2d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXWZ3pGhOugkTBQG2=0J8PdTkeefqToCsrGGQVV=rv=gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18117
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I remember having almost this exact discussion in Tokyo.  The only
point that didn't come up this time was an argument Roberto made,
namely: "A frame type is cheaper (fewer bits) than a flag."