Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority

Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DA812951F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:31:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFYloVeus_bj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F59412983F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cCW4a-0002hH-7R for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:27:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:27:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCW4a-0002hH-7R@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>) id 1cCW4P-0002fi-C7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:26:57 +0000
Received: from mail.measurement-factory.com ([104.237.131.42]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>) id 1cCW4I-0005Ym-Vd for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:26:52 +0000
Received: from [65.102.233.169] (unknown [65.102.233.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.measurement-factory.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30149E05A; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:26:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
References: <4ea740d1-1df8-5a76-5198-dfd45b46955e@measurement-factory.com> <20161201180451.E97F518F77@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Message-ID: <f6d2379d-1f17-31a7-ecfb-de799b5f7c87@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:26:23 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161201180451.E97F518F77@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.237.131.42; envelope-from=rousskov@measurement-factory.com; helo=mail.measurement-factory.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.408, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cCW4I-0005Ym-Vd 9d2fa1ee06267d0b698dca0a7449ec25
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/f6d2379d-1f17-31a7-ecfb-de799b5f7c87@measurement-factory.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33070
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 12/01/2016 11:04 AM, Kari Hurtta wrote:

> these are HTTP/1.1 to HTTP/2 conversion examples

IMHO, the current text of the RFC Examples section hides this assumption
well. If your assumption is correct, then this is worth an Errata entry
to add some kind of "these are message translation examples only; most
real HTTP/2 messages are formed differently" warning at the top of that
section.


> There should be "native" http/2 only examples also. 

Agreed. Unfortunately, the lack of examples is not something that is
appropriate to fix via Errata, I guess.


Thank you,

Alex.