Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 02:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9239E129B4A
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:15:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ILs0EU4W9YLx
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5887129618
for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>;
Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>)
id 1cFAeu-0006tB-9d
for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cFAeu-0006tB-9d@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76])
by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>)
id 1cFAei-0006rk-0a
for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:24 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170])
by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>)
id 1cFAeb-0003WE-LK
for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:18 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w33so4139195qtc.3
for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:10:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=jbQsgkoCRJrC2m5wxRNK6esEV+H1DHgYrUNO3ft34Ic=;
b=nAwuU/p+BbW+OzZutZ4m/Yx9M2wR7UrWS8xCzpwJMhRLu+XX4V4PG9Pz6BwP88NOod
4Rjiqu0zhB/N/Kyj4aUUZLTAaGiANjaDjc8w3LalsNKvacqR7m7FJOztuWYC7GgZYHMx
sJWV5qy1ZR1HP7f8C88LiHACfH/i5B4fx3yo87gtwPZDTnYR1pjWdYC6KYDDAQPlPfgR
p8U6/t5H9Ct4OYzwMnFAJ6tc7nzvfJzy04/gpfb2pd/zsPKJGqufxjQcAfEL2soXZlI9
8ROPmqNhk/9YsXRgO1zPxhP+Tlan4r2wkJ3JF8qV2oIY+HjD6UEn6Y9pdZtkxaykbu9P
5FUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=jbQsgkoCRJrC2m5wxRNK6esEV+H1DHgYrUNO3ft34Ic=;
b=ZYjxbcyjHy4emOyIf0mS9iBS5pGZqg/H7opFAzkYZ5/YBVZZ+2Rl/wlSf1rObRCeXL
9Qg3QvYTkSqFEc88/2afS2CFmGFHvPM3qbgPF3eiq2KW49AhfE2wD5a6CI+fsS+b1Xaa
UsjOI6NZe2VLwA2AkhwjOzh+olvGb9xWdwjU415KxboZhlKRp5XwBldp0W/pNzpJy9Y4
t0bU+dQRDAAnfnzbsLM5dRC1hq/fUV3yFWgQzhevBPomMNbEnhx7AJqd/ZUpapoF3B/5
g+OhNRwluQeJFFiUOmn1atP/qJ5TD8dJPntUpZX/8umm/Q5IYitnTmMEk6uWsfrlFLJx
ooew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC007gHEkTlE3BezsWqr7kmQ2oJ52j10+hniSRG6pxQpVvZuF2stc1zS4HghlKOUxSiqSP3CbL4oQvk1fUw==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.249 with SMTP id i54mr67834220qta.13.1481249451390;
Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:10:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.38.233 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:10:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <95FCCB5F-A458-4BF8-A416-4B6FFD8B152B@mnot.net>
References: <95FCCB5F-A458-4BF8-A416-4B6FFD8B152B@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:10:50 -1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVxUOCvpwfA=GeFqMtF+eM8pJJ9=tsX9KJb-muVrPdpxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>,
Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.170;
envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt0-f170.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.357, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1,
W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cFAeb-0003WE-LK 70f03445660f84b14b1b440686a9915d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVxUOCvpwfA=GeFqMtF+eM8pJJ9=tsX9KJb-muVrPdpxg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33138
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 7 December 2016 at 18:03, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > As discussed in Seoul, there seems to be strong interest in adopting Patrick's draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcmanus-immutable I've said this before, but this is how we should be doing things here: shipping the specs for deployed code that makes a difference.
- Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Mark Nottingham
- RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Mike Bishop
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Martin J. Dürst
- RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Mike Bishop
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Martin Thomson
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable Mark Nottingham