Re: ID for Immutable

Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Fri, 28 October 2016 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA7E12944E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xh2azuQyeatp for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F00129AFC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c08py-0007CG-IZ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:12:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:12:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c08py-0007CG-IZ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1c08pv-00079k-L4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:12:51 +0000
Received: from smtpvgate.fmi.fi ([193.166.223.36]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1c08pp-0001wg-4S for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:12:46 +0000
Received: from basaari.fmi.fi (basaari.fmi.fi [193.166.211.14]) (envelope-from hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi) by smtpVgate.fmi.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/smtpgate-20161014/smtpVgate) with ESMTP id u9SFCGZV029364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:16 +0300
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi by basaari.fmi.fi with ESMTP id u9SFCFKd002201 ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:15 +0300
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by shell.siilo.fmi.fi with ESMTP id u9SFCFHx023419 ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:15 +0300
Received: by shell.siilo.fmi.fi id u9SFCFmN023418; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:15 +0300
Message-Id: <201610281512.u9SFCFmN023418@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpNAUccK0FO2HyvL7etnxEg2FRt0tvXwXxkR1q5wLy_gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNqam930_0eA1p3yHW+xDdOm0AAMKvVKe6xwNwm1itpRpQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161028144407.48EFF162D1@welho-filter4.welho.com> <CAOdDvNpNAUccK0FO2HyvL7etnxEg2FRt0tvXwXxkR1q5wLy_gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:15 +0300 (EEST)
Sender: hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha43]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: 3 received headers rewritten with id 20161028/56805/01
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: ID 56805/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Filter: basaari.fmi.fi: ID 149084/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtpVgate.fmi.fi [193.166.223.36]); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=193.166.223.36; envelope-from=hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi; helo=smtpVgate.fmi.fi
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.782, BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.418, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c08pp-0001wg-4S c922832d534363d70a7e1f1552c4ad7b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ID for Immutable
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/201610281512.u9SFCFmN023418@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32702
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>om>: (Fri Oct 28 17:50:16 2016)
> the notion of integrity hashes have failed in the past (notably md5)..
> separable from immutable imo and would rather not tie that anchor to its
> fate.

That why I wrote "Several immutable cache controls are invalid if they are result
of same hash-function" implying that hash-function is detectable
from result of function (Either by size or something like multihash
https://github.com/multiformats/multihash).

> > So that immutable does not have effect if result of hash-function
> > does not give same value that what is value of immutable
> > cache control.
> >
> > Several immutable cache controls are invalid if they are result
> > of same hash-function.

/ Kari Hurtta