Alt-Svc across a domain?

Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DFB12D968 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vKoadcL5PPf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811B812D1CC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aoaGQ-0008R9-1X for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:32:10 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:32:10 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aoaGQ-0008R9-1X@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rch@google.com>) id 1aoaGN-0008PD-FO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:32:07 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rch@google.com>) id 1aoaGM-0008VV-4U for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:32:07 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u206so30940011wme.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=A1f1gjz16DqQB89JIhkqJRmNGgs32lgC9ZtxbxQP8Ug=; b=YKobO2GxE0kWMydrGeRhrvT39unsxT98YNteILpV+CSxtkDaiqoQPP3+6nA2sDJNvy BCViBw5U95eJ9xBlZLSBCeOy0YtppC5gVltkY34oyo0lS6xfNzFOPvss4+hGccGakZgd CInT8GVHjBds2qEw1PbLtQWq7tX32or7PveGmzKTiayoOVrzHfp05D6AwNwDxKVezweS Te89hxQIcXm1SOO2CdWXrutA62nyNqmbuKN9Q9NEWRfqmo1aVCwVw3wfmqbRCVwq1zZQ oDeju6YBjJ//S8Foxyc8MJwOlhhb76cyFMpPTploPjurGrWq0HW21d/6dvm54g6E+95b fDdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=A1f1gjz16DqQB89JIhkqJRmNGgs32lgC9ZtxbxQP8Ug=; b=RRj8CRxXt0UoosMVPCn3R88WMF0/DmR2cnDzuD5Z6XbyDEBZ+VHOMtNr7f1V8nUI29 /qp7tPAVxpeJFowimcNayB5R3k5iA2DuIorj/yxljnQaCSgevxbgk32GjkxjrsgEL6FW xl1tZVHnBE79PcVhoiOb5NV1JMN3pBWGyL1b7C6w5mnUVzB5yU2+VQmYMOQbhP5Uyb1d WkdoN1tV8TFXwbTngXyWX8bfiHYBFKdRPrQZyqY9NuYnTrpSm/om5BdWvjUM50AyvLKN jCwOuGgIRU/+GOGrO98hCSVonbxNLj/vDN7GQ7xzNqvQ3dLoxCua7AC0P9CrUne5Pqmz Pn2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJRbAbrj58NN4y//XRJjvciChajYnnZPZSUEfH9jn5UXOSleFClzpEZjRYhSVsGXJ12YwGAOHJlR37hov6X
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.215.16 with SMTP id o16mr4906750wmg.57.1460136699237; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.201 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:31:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ_4DfS3qxB+pePU_0sD3XD_7jc8MntRZ9f2mH8eabH30WzyqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145ba2c485ef8052ffc912d"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.54; envelope-from=rch@google.com; helo=mail-wm0-f54.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aoaGM-0008VV-4U c9a3f96c0f668ea38fc820b98464323e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Alt-Svc across a domain?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJ_4DfS3qxB+pePU_0sD3XD_7jc8MntRZ9f2mH8eabH30WzyqA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31396
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Howdy,

It is common for web sites to serve content from a variety of different
origins within the same domain. For example, www.example.com,
accounts.example.com, images.example.com. A single page view may require
loading resources from several such origins. (Tricks like domain sharing
can exacerbate this proliferation of origins.) It would be great if the
service had some way to tell the client, "All of my domains can use this
alternative service". What would folks thinks of an include-subdomains
parameter in the Alt-Svc value? If such a parameter were present in an
Alt-Svc advertisement, a client could use this advertisement to apply to
any sub-domain of the origin that the client does not already have an
alternative for. This would avoid the need to discover the alternatives
individually.

Cheers,

Ryan