IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Resumable Uploads

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD50121F89B0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9-kgclX+JT3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C340C21F89A5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTPxG-0005Iq-3X for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:03:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:03:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTPxG-0005Iq-3X@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nico@cryptonector.com>) id 1UTPxC-0005IB-FQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:03:14 +0000
Received: from caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.81] helo=homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nico@cryptonector.com>) id 1UTPxB-0000F9-C7 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:03:14 +0000
Received: from homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D462AC05D for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=LPz7yfKD7HCVF/8vPEh4 mydOJRk=; b=tdt86hABZM4A/IuQKk4jt32isRUzaqlkevRFy88YobKEI6z4doet 3irV3kO11JxLgsfVZ9btAW59YDgUHBf6ZTIy8tbT66tttMWx/LTwkKX8fORvWW2e 4ddQpZgfTgkGv5i4EevZyToXlSmCDVM8YIOeWU0sIic9EoKfXEp5UcQ=
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0441D2AC058 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t11so4323280wey.20 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1MhJaYNvU2SAKf2t8UFZTWmWRgcV8twOt4PNXrokZow=; b=LB5dv3u56PfhwkIJWy6roZWahCYhrmALvWH5y7hF8Wq4nNqzA5cIIa0Wc/B7ibHWLH V3xZs47hGDVCgeZ9uDrxdu3UQ9oJV0CxYQTZElZRFn9fo18TpQ5aNUnM/K+oTZRV8mNZ hegM+B49j4O4eZQz8h0G78dyn8BlGYQ/m23yygQevDjbCzQvavhg/mCFagmf3YP7dJB8 4D/UsLw6SKvLy/ELGon+oVUz4Eruuoz744whVmCBoiqWHxPqTnUCCwIYvR6KQLHnhDs/ KVHBpFuOPvjaG1z661pIZ+X9/EFPgYv9w0UmrQSUAMmYRx2DiQfzVdUP/KOgkI30zDtr KY4g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.173 with SMTP id m13mr30755976wiv.27.1366434170267; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.66.71 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.66.71 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW70B4daZBm_txGFcUC3zaB8-8926tkiCESFN8nVb24Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADZbJ9dYFGyrceh03M3B0KdKto7160Dis_geh9um0BhVe1re0g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1304182006001.21288@tvnag.unkk.fr> <29DE6A70-E3B9-4DCE-8C7E-506F6A0ADC92@gmail.com> <51706F32.5030108@panix.com> <5170E2A3.6010706@gmx.de> <CADZbJ9dGEVq-fQmhjRsddYdcg459r_zLfrOddkzHLOprZM0dNg@mail.gmail.com> <51712A49.6000901@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1304191335410.3525@tvnag.unkk.fr> <CABkgnnVFW5zkH-0eY=iyDuFAF9Ua6+4NL26KMP5Nf-cqxmXLJw@mail.gmail.com> <6FD4A73D-08D9-428B-B15A-935691A32BF9@tzi.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1304192255220.8950@tvnag.unkk.fr> <CABkgnnW70B4daZBm_txGFcUC3zaB8-8926tkiCESFN8nVb24Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:02:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOj5XF3dz2-jAfWMdt000dtHm6W7tAvy7P9CKFp7DPta7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Felix Geisendörfer <felix@transloadit.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c07e053efd704dac3bf10"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=208.97.132.81; envelope-from=nico@cryptonector.com; helo=homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTPxB-0000F9-C7 0afe4e3428812c592a0da17ec970cec2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Resumable Uploads
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAK3OfOj5XF3dz2-jAfWMdt000dtHm6W7tAvy7P9CKFp7DPta7A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17379
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Apr 19, 2013 5:13 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 19 April 2013 13:56, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:
> > I'd just add that a resumed upload does not necessarily imply a previous
> > upload failure. It could also be that you're appending parts over time
as
> > they "come in" or similar.
>
> I'd have thought that this is a perfect fit for PATCH.  Nothing new
needed.

Sure, but how do you indicate that a transfer is complete?

Nico
--

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status