Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> Wed, 02 May 2012 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6C521F898D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdASuDCHfQET for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5731021F898B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SPYPp-0002HS-76 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:12:17 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1SPYPe-0002Gb-CS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:12:06 +0000
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1SPYPW-0002QG-2g for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:12:04 +0000
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1SPYP9-0005Qk-F4 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 14:11:35 +0200
Received: from 192.196.142.20 ([192.196.142.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 02 May 2012 14:11:35 +0200
Received: from nicolas.mailhot by 192.196.142.20 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 02 May 2012 14:11:35 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <loom.20120502T141000-273@post.gmane.org>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 192.196.142.20 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1SPYPW-0002QG-2g e7bf3c7c27429debf81e35ec9b2e5b42
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/loom.20120502T141000-273@post.gmane.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13513
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SPYPp-0002HS-76@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:12:17 +0000

William Chan (陈智昌 <willchan@...> writes:

> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy" internally
> and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works.

That's great news, thanks a lot!
Did you have any feedback from other browser teams?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot