Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 00:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2BE1A0026 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A5FxK1FaFxca for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43ACA1A000E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XH0NP-0000qv-K0 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:55:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:55:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XH0NP-0000qv-K0@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XH0N5-0000pk-Be for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:55:27 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XH0N2-0001kh-US for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:55:26 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m15so9106684wgh.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Uu83kR0EMlxeb5E82hh2u9gFBJyU9qB6zXy9ZrNPBMQ=; b=JI1LgaQ9sQRHO3zs8bQzpjpSHftmxvM4IIzXXV5L4CEVRg5zrcU9I1uvBC3PFtY+iZ KzrqYV2OneY89HxrMaO6n2t7aEHeP1dTnq1ykPBSvR68yTxQypU56nZcB4S+Ty5T8ki1 66jAOjJfMLUunXc+hMHj8Qrn3Pi97E9HV+/ij2W/fyF5ZPg0CMxBkF8MC4cFEjAQ00dE ZRZIVXEbd03301de569EKB9G2QzwZzKn7X/lGj0/xf1oJ0qttMPDEybivrZkQYkpNOb6 3dmhYtvQW1MkCeDOvk4RGTXzSmfjYgzvGyS3GjnzNt/9NJwd3Dj3Q+lt2bqCV+6i53gt Yusg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlheXHfXt8AIlnovNS5m4srOQPHgK/r8LDazJQa3zqu1akKa3aUdLulQhXYjUk4wWq0fM41
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.12.38 with SMTP id v6mr23826209wib.31.1407804898495; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.169.98 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVgnJSmJW2B4nJ8Vb-Nwi3EF2pra7D_m8uqZfQ8H1a2eA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVgnJSmJW2B4nJ8Vb-Nwi3EF2pra7D_m8uqZfQ8H1a2eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:54:58 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGofk6bsLOr510MuSVuh9=EhTVBYROGBnAdeie-YQS-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c240eae368ee0500641e12"
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=74.125.82.44; envelope-from=gregw@intalio.com; helo=mail-wg0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.101, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XH0N2-0001kh-US 5f06d44184c2e64673268591351e1635
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NGofk6bsLOr510MuSVuh9=EhTVBYROGBnAdeie-YQS-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26587
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 12 August 2014 08:03, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > Are we OK with this? Not really. If we are going to have CONTINUATIONs, then either they need to be true jumbo frames as currently specified (can't be interleaved by anything) OR they should be fully interleaveable by any other frame. It is entirely too complex and fragile to allow continuations to be interleaved by extension frames but not normal frames. Although I guess that would allow an extension to be defined that has a bunch of frame types that are identical to normal frame types, except that they can be interleaved between continuations when normal ones can't be. cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
- Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Amos Jeffries
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- RE: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Mike Bishop
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Mark Nottingham