Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sat, 20 April 2013 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8000421F8FD6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSLfNGW6lEr5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB57121F8FF1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTSlP-0007uL-Mj for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:03:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:03:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTSlP-0007uL-Mj@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTSlM-0007tg-O4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:03:12 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTSlM-0007Br-6g for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:03:12 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.190.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B667509B6; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:02:50 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130420080114.GO26517@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:02:46 +1000
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D38D91DC-7FF5-4539-B48D-A331F0710DB0@mnot.net>
References: <5C8F5647-EC0C-4EE2-81AF-8B1F340E3D24@mnot.net> <20130420080114.GO26517@1wt.eu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.340, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UTSlM-0007Br-6g 4b3534d268b615b787e39f02be4462ea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D38D91DC-7FF5-4539-B48D-A331F0710DB0@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17405
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 20/04/2013, at 6:01 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 05:39:50PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Strictly editorial feedback on the current p2:
>> * 2 "The target of each HTTP request"   s/each/a/
> 
> Isn't it s/each/an/ instead ?
> 
> (I'm not a native speaker and that's how I learned it, but I can be corrected).


It depends on whether you pronounce it "aigch" or "haigch." I personally don't care which we choose, as long as it's consistent.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/