Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt

Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> Sat, 13 June 2020 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025DF3A0903 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.b=orjuISom; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=BPXpdK+B
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h30tsEL7DWVh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A513A0905 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jk6Go-0004Wy-MM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:32:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:32:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jk6Go-0004Wy-MM@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <murch@fastmail.com>) id 1jk6Gm-0004WB-Ml for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:32:24 +0000
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <murch@fastmail.com>) id 1jk6Gk-0007kX-Qx for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:32:24 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27A75C0087 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:32:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm3; bh=7 ITKsAdnfDVYtpmDEt1s57RRPP1KkLWqS0kSeq8N++I=; b=orjuISomONcD37eBv LpYsyGJl3BiVCTO+E8OXyqpwSrlf4I+p5ZfUB7YjlmLMOdYVFf3xrJinnDqBalJh vTkBxY43C0y21BI7HQwzeyatQaTizdIokyIasZtvIwZ/rLwpD8HbKhvYut4/deSM SbDDLW39w+PTv+dIJJglgRtU+mtN0+4GJciKmFmvjiuSrgPjMCuuK0DPmOnA9vzv q3UVjYUi33jy3QLvzhK3ui9VTUJi3RwJJwi5C0dAhnqzZY0+T4O2Ym3FXDoGJhdF DzOWTdpTTH997cbF4yUlIgT9dFfzA0eXg5sjVU3UayagXdVonCFL2D1EaTcYihzw nARIg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=7ITKsAdnfDVYtpmDEt1s57RRPP1KkLWqS0kSeq8N+ +I=; b=BPXpdK+BVOEKQp7S3qGRIcmH6+rr6pglTlaZC+L+1v0ddxvOl0fWe+P5/ PI6+kGc/uBRH3cfOG4+2ttNn9EZgKjzKpZOR/+p9yprPcUlwrrlNw19JNjM8Bdeb ATCDJ5HbXo1lHdNuwQaF+Mo1Vf/CgFcPl1KKXbrjPW/+jVRVB+zwJ1spHal20Eli 3wCUqUWHFYts/n7YcPDzWeuHQcj5YFCKWPqy8S6c+7j596XegSL8G7+RphiXd0M4 y9jwzLeZO7AcRWWT3eBQ6f2wRozY+gPXKX11drrIsXZ7tUuk6heoDo9lNbHf9fVg Gptfw1krELvD2s76BujRzlpiA7WgQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:WtXkXn2Pmv-5BT0CbKk6kPW7PM6FNIcKExs4_37qlhpapU4jiuw0Mw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudeifedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghnucfouhhrtghhihhsohhnuceomhhurhgthhesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhffgteelueevuedthfefue dvueekgfekjeeuuefhtdelheetfffgvdetueeujeenucfkphepjeegrdejjedrkeehrddv hedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmh hurhgthhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:WtXkXmGC66Ys6DoFQSciHlMI2IHqc-i91-rMDBJtTzodKwXXiTY5GQ> <xmx:WtXkXn4BNvDEk26ncEb9HExlMDmQnNBE7aUeFU2nYYlurpqxODhMJA> <xmx:WtXkXs1CYbVB5b4ZZsjCtVj6S2KaCSqLBb1ZZ9RsdL96MM8aQysGQg> <xmx:WtXkXmEtqPTFDar_3L2-Bl1RIB6Y6UGQXKGKoo3tJ-t3Htu5fD0Wlw>
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A411328005D for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <159048066829.15360.13534615257560671669@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <2cd0d6c6-2ac9-5218-cf5c-068444b358aa@fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:32:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159048066829.15360.13534615257560671669@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=murch@fastmail.com; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jk6Gk-0007kX-Qx ca6b8cd2579e482d35f1877cff138f4f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/2cd0d6c6-2ac9-5218-cf5c-068444b358aa@fastmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37755
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

All,

I'm trying to verify my understanding of must-revalidate vs unqualified 
no-cache in responses per the text in Sections 5.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.3 
respectively.  Other than the point regarding the Authorization header 
field and must-revalidate, is the difference that unqualified no-cache 
requires validation for every request and must-revalidate only requires 
validation after the response has become stale?


--
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC