Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)

"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> Thu, 05 January 2012 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AD921F850C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:49:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i+uh5uUR+tzV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F003E21F84D5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1RivB8-000364-A4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:48:54 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1RivAy-000357-Ch for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:48:44 +0000
Received: from caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.81] helo=homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1RivAx-0001km-59 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:48:44 +0000
Received: from homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2572E43807F; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:48:21 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=gbiv.com; b=0nhoPOtmyimakxip TcSc4TooJRCZbrA8RcqyFmEg0l/NTEnpoC8LKv/etFwvQkXBmW/s8LNdWkgT1gKE KHa+JEDj7lWpkOxQhhqST5RAHc3fW8qVodKQLH1mxMCOhRydEsPpKR7pP+Tu3frh +RfPfZk3GGVVjBL6N/zF4T6u4jQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=OrvK5T/Vj1yxb3tOwI13owZfMyE=; b=WB/z06mL06h028Tv9mOOGqgljbX/ nfuBtR26I44xmVo415pZEI0XdyH8JvVi77ojKswVFOfVHuesrgXyoRyGNUjmqeIj 6db+wVa/KURValvL9f84tI+wXPCD+W+eKDsIKwaJqMc5LY3QlpQl1fcnBxINlQ2O zhgkXbDq3xtwAAc=
Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBA6243807E; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F0608AB.20808@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:48:22 -0800
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EDB1544B-C4AE-41CA-806A-15FD1956D467@gbiv.com>
References: <6A53E99A-019D-4F6D-A33D-24524CD34E17@mnot.net> <4EFDFA17.4080804@gmx.de> <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06121B5AE5@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4F0608AB.20808@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=208.97.132.81; envelope-from=fielding@gbiv.com; helo=homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1RivAx-0001km-59 3e8fcc9aae02d09a4286330c220b3ab2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/EDB1544B-C4AE-41CA-806A-15FD1956D467@gbiv.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11984
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1RivB8-000364-A4@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:48:54 +0000

Sorry, I'm not following this logic at all.  Reusing the original fragment
after a redirect is, at best, fallback behavior that would occur *inside*
the user agent renderer after URI parsing is done, after the redirect is
done, and without any reference to the Location URI.  In short, this whole
approach is wrong (and confusing).

....Roy