Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
Al Morton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 06 June 2021 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ECD3A0C44 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I79vLf2YJBTr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAEE63A22B4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lpwsr-00064w-Ii for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:48:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:48:25 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lpwsr-00064w-Ii@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lpwsg-00064A-Bo for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:48:16 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lpwsW-0007H4-Vx for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:48:09 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8428E3A22B9; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Al Morton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <162300167247.22542.13551351858394953533@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 10:47:52 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1lpwsW-0007H4-Vx a98901b438c7b614dba133e0c07d878d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/162300167247.22542.13551351858394953533@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38856
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reviewer: Al Morton Review result: Ready Since this review was requested with a very short deadline, it only allows for a "surgical" response. This draft obsoletes RFC 7234, and Appendix B lists the changes from RFC 7234. Assuming this list is complete and correct, all of the changes appear to improve the situation from an operational perspective, so it's good to go. Nit: == Unused Reference: 'RFC7234' is defined on line 1766, but no explicit reference was found in the text Thanks to the authors for taking-up this work; several years and many revisions were involved to reach this point.
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cac… Al Morton via Datatracker
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis… Mark Nottingham