[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 31 August 2022 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE26C15949A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxuq7V59InbL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0867AC14CE30 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1oTPrh-00Fjbo-IK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:42:53 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:42:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1oTPrh-00Fjbo-IK@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1oTPrf-00Fjaq-DS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:42:51 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([50.223.129.200] helo=rfcpa.amsl.com) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1oTPrd-006fnI-Q4 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:42:51 +0000
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C5540AB20A; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, mnot@mnot.net, tpauly@apple.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: james.synge@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220831154236.C5540AB20A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:42:36 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.200; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com; helo=rfcpa.amsl.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1oTPrd-006fnI-Q4 a233792920fd5b79987abe4fe2a17a19
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20220831154236.C5540AB20A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40361
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110,
"HTTP Semantics".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7107

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: James Synge <james.synge@gmail.com>

Section: 6.5.1

Original Text
-------------
For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
(Section 7.1.2 of [HTTP/1.1]).

Corrected Text
--------------
For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
(Section ?.?.? of [HTTP/1.1]).

Notes
-----
Section 7.1.2 does not exist. It isn't clear to me which section is the intended target of the reference.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : HTTP Semantics
Publication Date    : June 2022
Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : HTTP
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG