IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Discussion of 9.2.2

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 26 September 2014 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C5C1A1A8F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3ko0Zh8gi3o for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA491A1A8C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XXQbB-00039f-9A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:09:53 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:09:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XXQbB-00039f-9A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XXQag-00038k-5u for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:09:22 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XXQaf-0000FD-I0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:09:22 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id hz20so14250555lab.29 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r6M9sRPgaS9lGaqxl/Hg7mOHgEnEHRmNnigSQlkiIbU=; b=czZhW/GFncVkj8i2ecoM682mkZ+9UPxTWl0wQTrwzFmlf0aLT+mo30JKK1mnNHEGQT PF47gpuTtEA5szrsunRXl91hPcmN/hrO4U0zAK7ju3u6u1hoehP/aUR8pnILiOIxNUrP 6gRy3ns28d56btqoRMYYxWAmloYjKly78e1XE3ZkK+kJtQRRPJPO6N+/jns4YWPM9v9E IHMTBvcaLtfH2qDnzyWI7URP6NR8ux/vNJesfqvSNbrkPUdx8EiMNcmtL6HwnL5XxHtR znR1hoTSXommM5D9HRhN0S1rrbErpaPb9GMmw+0srVQhLknJs9zakmGu1GWH+dRanc0j YZoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.34.78 with SMTP id x14mr2940010lbi.38.1411718935040; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 01:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F0D4BA2A-46B2-4F1A-8A23-1A319A3E5FC0@mnot.net>
References: <F0D4BA2A-46B2-4F1A-8A23-1A319A3E5FC0@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:08:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWszVer8Y3qgmEQnxNKUhroUEeseC8JkBbGT2P6z3iZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.42; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f42.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.785, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XXQaf-0000FD-I0 b279565bab01fa77488372f4b05eb5b0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Discussion of 9.2.2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWszVer8Y3qgmEQnxNKUhroUEeseC8JkBbGT2P6z3iZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27255
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 24 September 2014 12:17, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> <http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#rfc.section.9.2.2>

I've updated my pull request on this subject.  There are a few
editorial changes in the mix, but the commit log shows exactly what
changes are involved:

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/615

I believe that these changes resolve the issues people have raised.
That is, other than the one which states we shouldn't have this
section at all.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status