IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: #578 [was: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices]

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 22 October 2014 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F0B1A8A78 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMZpdP_V92BN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F631A8A70 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XgmaJ-0004gg-0F for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:27:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:27:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XgmaJ-0004gg-0F@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1XgmaA-0004fH-8C for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:27:30 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Xgma8-0003N9-7J for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:27:30 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.83] (unknown [118.209.19.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B3AA22E257; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:27:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <544716EF.9000506@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:27:01 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C2A9D4A-A025-40A6-85B5-94BB497F7AEC@mnot.net>
References: <CAH_y2NHhDTDtM4+DvWAf66GiO7of4H+ouMhxzseGODhfCSchXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzwyDuuN=-DyGiWAfttwq7O_zUGOE=7kVf5J=qu6i_-A9ezfg@mail.gmail.com> <543E0400.8080009@treenet.co.nz> <20141015201540.GB980@1wt.eu> <6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E53BF5F842@ADELE.crf.canon.fr> <20141016091626.GC3079@1wt.eu> <34008D72-5800-412E-A276-81C6C7BFA9E2@mnot.net> <20141020165353.GA25743@1wt.eu> <8F120E2F-704E-44CB-ACF2-C743B870B2B6@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNdOHVj=YTE35Vj7mbED0OKghd-mpnFZSMcZNBM3JybJDg@mail.gmail.com> <20141021092505.GA30397@1wt.eu> <52739.1413883975@critter.freebsd.dk> <25161D34-E91E-4E8D-9567-ADEED5F4AA24@redhat.com> <828C8FEF-CE2B-4D48-806B-FEEBFF764025@mnot.net> <544716EF.9000506@treenet.co.nz>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.070, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Xgma8-0003N9-7J ef4cd92a6350fb79e0d3f5ec2d11b353
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #578 [was: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices]
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8C2A9D4A-A025-40A6-85B5-94BB497F7AEC@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27671
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

That's reasonable, Amos; I'll start a separate thread to ask for positions on status quo vs. Jeff's proposal vs. Willy's.

Cheers,


> On 22 Oct 2014, at 1:31 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 22/10/2014 1:53 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> This thread seems to be going off into defining an extension, which
>> is entirely appropriate.
>> 
>> I'm not seeing broad acclaim for making any changes to the existing
>> scheme in the spec itself; in particular, Jeff's proposal failed to
>> get wide support.
>> 
>> So, I think we can mark #578 as closed without action.
> 
> I see only an extension for the unrelated timestamp things.
> 
> 
> Can we try seriously for a consensus on just Willys' patch to separate
> the tables?
> 
> Other proposals got their own "vote" threads and many days before a
> consensus/non-consensus was declared. This one has only just had 25hrs
> buried at the back end of a long heated discussion.
> 
> It is distinct from Jeff's reversal proposal and offers benefits to
> all participant "camps" over both that and the status quo. I fear it
> has got lost amidst this long thread on a rushed timescale.




--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status