IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Implementation Notes on Server Push

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A079121F9050 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiHmu8BEGDQL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FBE21F9023 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UciZK-0004mI-4f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:45:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:45:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UciZK-0004mI-4f@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1UciZ8-0004fj-Cm for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:44:50 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com ([144.254.224.147]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1UciZ3-0003oL-F0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:44:50 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1581; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368650685; x=1369860285; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=gF+/SZY50UZdnMnv5c7o9c7WDm5BpijCFjzU7JHcXk8=; b=V4c707z4JVH1HG/IE7ndY6aA5s3NSaAACXe5c0HbikIhM0arEdX0DCKA nbaeQLCOIXtLdu7zb+sReO+6MSGwb0pDoPHXn7DRNsf6MIbdEmAKgDzPS JBPefc8U58Aaov+WhLikrEYaK4ORTwDspRsurPb/nYpxSpdKWW8X2Lh1l w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArAHACfzk1GQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABbgweDc4Vetz99FnSCFgkBAQEEI1UBEAsDAQoKCRYLAgIJAwIBAgErGgYNAQcBAYgIq0+RUo8eB4JCgRMDlzSRPYMSOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,679,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="13959601"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2013 20:44:18 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.215.216]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4FKiGRp012960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 May 2013 20:44:16 GMT
Message-ID: <5193F3A0.1060105@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:44:16 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CAOdDvNqXhG7+xbvBwctQCR4tZePKByw75SR5oBamXTymZa7myA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNexObA2ub0gm-dcj8dMR_xF2SASSmJAxrvfNU-mgXLf_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNexObA2ub0gm-dcj8dMR_xF2SASSmJAxrvfNU-mgXLf_w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080604000607040501050000"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.147; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-4.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.300, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.629, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UciZ3-0003oL-F0 11481fd62db870cd9314f51f4fdde9f2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Implementation Notes on Server Push
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5193F3A0.1060105@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18006
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5/14/13 9:25 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> I don't favor any MUST in the spec about requiring 304s in the first
> scenario, but informing people that this is silly would be good :)

Typically you only use a MUST on interoperability or security, and not
for performance (unless that turns somehow into a security issue, which
I don't see here).

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email