[Technical Errata Reported] RFC8188 (8621)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 October 2025 20:32 UTC
Received: by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) id 896C57F1B63F; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818F7F1B63D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.017, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="p49mz62e"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="TJIG+jJQ"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ss-SYNMI7bQO for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mab.w3.org (mab.w3.org [IPv6:2600:1f18:7d7a:2700:d091:4b25:8566:8113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97667F1B42F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:Date:Message-Id:Content-Type:Cc:From:To:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version; bh=VJnOmAftuj9Tj9g5+1z23e88uHfWjhGgO7xNHhF14Xk=; b=p 49mz62euu00VtK3zHa1eS2uHuvlTblfWxAwTquS3pri8eVfCSlDhh41ge/UhMR30bS0d5dUied7nC FIQoMb7sDqR32d1pNVkmCpUso+S4U81oq4AEKHNu3D4Kfmf8q4ORtOKPp1x8aXU/4rT0/KajKL4jR kydSeLCjn8hhhXD98UdddSOGFGIQvBS14DoHkx0rM5y0JO9ld166zch3DkhuVmLUVTsZAsxjNPuXv mo0NygCqwBb2tCro2EbRqPpsjik0WYZVtJJxC0Uqm1XkXGwVGwcdnq1gUxbySMQ6OHgaQnR/W5Rxn A9zI+CxValHc8e3lAkKcIe0o+jgKHwJGA==;
Received: from lists by mab.w3.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1vEZIm-00GQPy-2T for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:31:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:31:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1vEZIm-00GQPy-2T@mab.w3.org>
Received: from ip-10-0-0-144.ec2.internal ([10.0.0.144] helo=pan.w3.org) by mab.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>) id 1vEZIk-00GQOs-2Q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.internal; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:31:18 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Date:Message-Id:Content-Type:Cc:From:Subject:To:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version; bh=VJnOmAftuj9Tj9g5+1z23e88uHfWjhGgO7xNHhF14Xk=; t=1761856278; x=1762720278; b=TJIG+jJQFlSMT+8WSuAtIiIyxRRvCxeCb2JhHlu1XqFXOwO cQJrdQQ7WbetlCaWoHW9cF1eait2AGvQgQF5Yo7YadvZIbQalYo9WD7IuNfhSkmQaFRHpWuyP6xk8 o0sG+ZjmhBkU0lI0W1ddWIORFWbRGy+yCbhbvpRGS8ZGWTC18VNx0YtxxsRd0OLFOfhzOAXfrhX0/ mTOppahgXsz0pp1Bu/7O3mciTrKhVHFhI18u1QXOSwUdMS9m/czgbUu4/iJ86OTulGMfv30Shyzpt zpD+Atq5o8tLZPeXnrM7nycfFXgNx1XI5TMgeZi7n6sPWPzbDNS+2J4BmYHNKmtA==;
Received-SPF: pass (pan.w3.org: domain of rfcpa.rfc-editor.org designates 166.84.6.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=166.84.6.31; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org; helo=mail2.ietf.org;
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by pan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>) id 1vEZIk-00BKvx-0R for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:31:18 +0000
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ED37F1AFF0; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 9E44FC000BCA; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: martin.thomson@gmail.com, httpbis-ads@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, tpauly@apple.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: patrick@psbarrett.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20251030203105.9E44FC000BCA@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:31:05 -0700
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DMARC_MISSING=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: pan.w3.org 1vEZIk-00BKvx-0R 014d2e8710493962460822a2d4a58a53
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8188 (8621)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20251030203105.9E44FC000BCA@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/53494
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8188, "Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8621 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Patrick Barrett <patrick@psbarrett.com> Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 73 Content-Encoding: aes128gcm uNCkWiNYzKTnBN9ji3-qWAAAABkCYTHOG8chz_gnvgOqdGYovxyjuqRyJFjEDyoF 1Fvkj6hQPdPHI51OEUKEpgz3SsLWIqS_uA Corrected Text -------------- HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 74 Content-Encoding: aes128gcm uNCkWiNYzKTnBN9ji3-qWAAAABkCYTHOG8chz_gnvgOqdGYovxyjuqRyJFjEDyoF 1Fvkj6hQPdPHfNE6ZBBGizjWQMll3XVvzJ8 Notes ----- This is the same issue as Erata ID 8620 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8620) but for the next example. This one I'm less sure about. The RFC never explicitly says whether the final padding delimiter is required or not, but, by my reading at least, does strongly imply it is required in several places. Assuming the final padding delimiter is required, this example should include it. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8188 (draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP Publication Date : June 2017 Author(s) : M. Thomson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : HTTP Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8188 (8621) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8188 (8621) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8188 (8621) Patrick Barrett