Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D491294A6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Twk6yrDBKVFK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C918D129572 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c8fsk-0006dr-TU for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:07:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:07:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c8fsk-0006dr-TU@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c8fse-0006cD-9U for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:06:56 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c8fsY-0000P6-5D for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:06:51 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x190so335281312qkb.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:06:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ss/WTexOeHhvGMBzmBzj+2gG6+NyDaKGZGmxe5Fhk+0=; b=bRGO/h/TBzNYHnKLyLa/pXlyDHkxHCLLlr7KrZG/KlitytYEfpxDE+qb4uTCWdL6fr ACVA83sn9YzDZnPGiLRr2jFiyu7AAxJeEobI600cDCS0Zk5Yvqin6myNbRtS0zqk++Vv RmC9qt6dPv7r45QmqWaXZzRJTh++WTAQvHcSoEaq29cldXm1D1GtLP1wVo1NJtqhWFdh HDU1zJci0hqyD7hGSmDanVZCJigmODNNuBanEIGLhwCG/GoqBfaqyk1B7l4uA8jFYEDM zZ9DlaZ+YbVCKU3nA+HBQdSkLC+8fOAlVElokvHNSiidjrUckolOFsTrS4OMTj+YSUgq MWRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Ss/WTexOeHhvGMBzmBzj+2gG6+NyDaKGZGmxe5Fhk+0=; b=VdIW5v6R31G5JEZYTcMYdDjZvTkd9n1Pgo8U6CyBb+oUGRZboX0mqVW3amKC1fjZox yW56IdEkXMKXLi4Faxmsny4Ns/6GAUN1fQcZcyNCulFO+K/qfz07SmvYNCdJO6IV59+2 0vjJvQURE613aSU5CgzPLDjffcUeH+0/ixNn4CHJ2xub0YVYzbGMw4VakYmphCLG/H+W AoBEVXRGHNYmiMBYwgVlesc4LICeO3lmyXUtl9jl2Os4nX7ryiaPMne9sAF9LbHukdgu Vtjd4BA4zDfN56d3Zep+ahk0oq1ZyOgymHFDBt7DL365IMLU8Ut5EN8VUtWlO5+lPfSR Scdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00+Q9nehErw5/7/kSBMUq853LGbNlSl+mFdPgHcJgDFo594FE3inwXiY01gbOtDUGOnqLCLNwRPTvavjA==
X-Received: by 10.55.99.141 with SMTP id x135mr12814495qkb.147.1479701183242; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:06:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.101 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:06:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXQ7jFX+U0Ziai_kmja740h-6MBmBG5vxNF5Tr2fpTX3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXQ7jFX+U0Ziai_kmja740h-6MBmBG5vxNF5Tr2fpTX3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:06:22 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWY_tXAPtBuBPmBUW=TNh09zxAVAOvee0qzqZkqti=43w@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.179; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f179.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.847, BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c8fsY-0000P6-5D 96cbdbe1cfc1520413cd7f74f8393a62
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWY_tXAPtBuBPmBUW=TNh09zxAVAOvee0qzqZkqti=43w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32945
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Oops, I didn't open the first PR, here 'tis:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/273

On 21 November 2016 at 14:56, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> As we discussed in the meeting (and before that, on the list), I've
> created a PR to remove the Crypto-Key header field.  As a result, the
> document is much, much smaller and cleaner.
>
> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/271
>
> There was also a comment about how to pad.  I ripped off some text
> from other protocols:
>
> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/272
>
> In the spirit of "you know when you are done when there is nothing
> left to remove", I think we are ready.  I'll give people a chance to
> read these, then post a new revision.