Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 23 December 2022 04:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027A8C1522AA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 20:47:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=V88eYi9p; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=h0ECRQwD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfSwSOS2dEq3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 20:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EDFC14F740 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 20:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1p8ZxT-0017G0-Bt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:59 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:59 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1p8ZxT-0017G0-Bt@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1p8ZxS-0017F3-Er for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:58 +0000
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1p8ZxQ-00EuDk-Vj for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:58 +0000
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD215C00AB; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 23:46:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 23:46:44 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1671770804; x= 1671857204; bh=p3WeEBwIgaM4rJ4Dsz8yGnAaX8uDcrvbos2ADQDN6g4=; b=V 88eYi9p3zXqh/fOvZrZxCxY8UxXHCpbHvOE07fKGcgpdi5kvin3y6o1b6Qj7AFj1 cvSa18dqtQaAK5eMNFGhlicLo80E+5sQ4D74jl/0B4BhPXqaHQCKOsdx5stTAwzK z9N0hvtFSg0uYqaHM+gglBngj1fAeCuswAVV01D7L08tMtY/NxX8uf/FfCATuvqN qs+fTe+exOuMrW3Cjz+n+9Nwgti1pCu8VluW8xbyOAu6DGl70SJMn2XWCA1/gAR2 EB9OwWSmQidSs7qgR2LrLoF+gTpvRu15v9rBR9KsJLPIQqrSJlFdqxiOTngNMcfP Zc4YNUPTDOoICgkCfLD7Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1671770804; x= 1671857204; bh=p3WeEBwIgaM4rJ4Dsz8yGnAaX8uDcrvbos2ADQDN6g4=; b=h 0ECRQwDjgsK8mBtjWsmEIhHmqgpbKNgrna2uSQNqwFCtDyzh8Pg7DszwXhQAySW6 XaLUpZa49sGm/HJ/cw7GkQsEfRsvTXogBEb/g5Y1ig7tIlxvcCyQZMyx/GDqSJHR 9W0AdGr0xMKZsSC2gtyRIiKgPUDQv4XnQbBJ2ULx9Zmd6p2RWWFwnAnVW+tkxC4J MR9Md+90xLuoYb5qpL6S4/EOLjwSE8H1Hj2GuUAEa7FxkDMyissTU4wBA44ZSmKG JumGBpzajRTVTs6JaHIEZr+fKyVNPwSrEQM6K9junV0UOiyw7DLgx26iPSsb587q 0MKbEmYMtz/jeZGp7q0kg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:szKlY4BuM2w2ljwqM6sQoN4JNCMir619xtekqXVTot1-qzqmRiQgtw> <xme:szKlY6goI23s4F33gGsv_6S8dj099yVDAMV7Opx6VOo4arZOZ2Dj4uIn6Q_mZ-Tso 69Z-oyvpbjW2ZCTEQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:szKlY7mXvzA_gBjA-5NNHRZSL31juNrBYNCa9r3Wk3Ty05JcIijCB59Q9T6gsvYuc-U-Udiqxu3zNa65gaqH_4ZZYx-XzUUyiV9jj3DF0693plFjpIKEYmvE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrhedugdejjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehm nhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeefudefjedvhfekvdeghffggfdvhf elffejgfdtkefhtedvgffgieefvdfggefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtgho mhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:szKlY-w7U3VowFXiyRnsvFKZ0wqjtmWzpOGJZLR91J7Gv8b8XUyDiw> <xmx:szKlY9RPGt5h6_f1qTO9jdRgsieQDLxuGOpLNkufzmTZlYij9yuXDg> <xmx:szKlY5YRQyUUdApIVyycTEUx9ybocweK8P160Js7KSweC6SkguzRsg> <xmx:tDKlY-6S-ET-PKofblBOzp4zFzqLQgiFzesCiNafGA5nbVEyr3jKKw>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 23:46:42 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <167177001372.31057.3192955191778410098@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:46:18 +1100
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D47E814-3A7C-441F-A591-D7F0DD9D0CF5@mnot.net>
References: <167177001372.31057.3192955191778410098@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1p8ZxQ-00EuDk-Vj 9b8c338d79bd42a6f2013ed4c855d87a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/3D47E814-3A7C-441F-A591-D7F0DD9D0CF5@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40661
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi folks, The diff below isn't that useful. See: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/compare/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-00...draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01 ... then click 'Files changed', scroll down to the sfbis document, and click 'Load changes'. Cheers, > On 23 Dec 2022, at 3:33 pm, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the HTTP WG of the IETF. > > Title : Structured Field Values for HTTP > Authors : Mark Nottingham > Poul-Henning Kamp > Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt > Pages : 38 > Date : 2022-12-22 > > Abstract: > This document describes a set of data types and associated algorithms > that are intended to make it easier and safer to define and handle > HTTP header and trailer fields, known as "Structured Fields", > "Structured Headers", or "Structured Trailers". It is intended for > use by specifications of new HTTP fields that wish to use a common > syntax that is more restrictive than traditional HTTP field values. > > This document obsoletes RFC 8941; Appendix D lists changes. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-01.txt Mark Nottingham