Re: Op-sec simplification

Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Tue, 01 November 2016 05:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7312941C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C65JrVkqGwqk for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05FAE129510 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1Ra2-0006p5-Kt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 05:25:50 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 05:25:50 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1Ra2-0006p5-Kt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1c1RZz-0006oM-6E for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 05:25:47 +0000
Received: from smtpvgate.fmi.fi ([193.166.223.36]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1c1RZr-0003IN-97 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 05:25:42 +0000
Received: from souk.fmi.fi (souk.fmi.fi [193.166.211.113]) (envelope-from hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi) by smtpVgate.fmi.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/smtpgate-20161014/smtpVgate) with ESMTP id uA15P8Qe017927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi by souk.fmi.fi with ESMTP id uA15P8vR015995 ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by shell.siilo.fmi.fi with ESMTP id uA15P8KM009382 ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200
Received: by shell.siilo.fmi.fi id uA15P8V9009381; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200
Message-Id: <201611010525.uA15P8V9009381@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4CE68DCC-BE25-42DE-9247-4195103797EF@mnot.net>
References: <20161031053239.E9C6D12F5D@welho-filter3.welho.com> <842E817E-77E4-45E0-B5E3-D45F8D7AFA15@mnot.net> <CABkgnnVm2roXz5BiQeh5m2a_zcsfC3rFZ2pnoQ_m9k6b3K=58w@mail.gmail.com> <4CE68DCC-BE25-42DE-9247-4195103797EF@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200 (EET)
Sender: hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha43]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: 3 received headers rewritten with id 20161101/18881/01
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: ID 18888/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Filter: souk.fmi.fi: ID 30009/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtpVgate.fmi.fi [193.166.223.36]); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 07:25:08 +0200 (EET)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=193.166.223.36; envelope-from=hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi; helo=smtpVgate.fmi.fi
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.656, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c1RZr-0003IN-97 3b856e7f30db6d3a83ef719de46bbfb1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Op-sec simplification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/201611010525.uA15P8V9009381@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32779
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>et>: (Tue Nov  1 01:17:04 2016)
> 
> > On 1 Nov. 2016, at 10:15 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 1 November 2016 at 09:41, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> >> Hold on -- are we layering in a new requirement to use the absolute form of the URL?
> > 
> > I don't know how we carry the scheme any other way.  We might try to
> > weasel this as being not "directly" to the origin server.
> > 
> > Maybe I should point out that this is in contradiction to that section.

That may be good idea. (This spec requires scheme and http/1.1 spec does not
allow scheme to be used. )

> I suspect someone with a process bent will say that it needs to update 7230, and having an experimental doc update a standards track one might be... interesting. I suppose if we have consensus to do it, it might work.
> 
> 
> > (FWIW, the servers I'm aware of all handle absolute URIs well enough.)
> 
> Is there an implicit requirement for them to check that it was absolute?

Well, I suggested that on https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2016OctDec/0102.html

|  This specification registers a (HTTP) Status Codes:
|
|  [TO BE REMOVED: Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code Registry
|   http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes/http-status-codes.xhtml ]
|
|   +-------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|   | Value | Description                   | Reference   |
|   +-------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|   | TBD1  | Scheme Not Allowed            | Section 2.2 |
|   | TBD2  | Scheme Required               | Section 2.1 |
|   +-------+-------------------------------+-------------+
|
|   [TO BE REMOVED: TBD1 and TBD2 are from 4xx range. ]

 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

/ Kari Hurtta