Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> Wed, 19 October 2016 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42311295C8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4n5sRjUdeknv for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C522A1295AB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bwmh6-0007m9-Aw for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:57:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:57:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bwmh6-0007m9-Aw@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <fbraun@mozilla.com>) id 1bwmh0-0007l9-Ov for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:57:46 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <fbraun@mozilla.com>) id 1bwmgt-0005dp-T2 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:57:42 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f193so46080315wmg.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 01:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94u432knY8tgk7HlOq97aHuakzht+YnPo8EqdpMFwzE=; b=D4E3xLR0/S2uWFRMQmX3IOoA49PnxUqNVeVZe26vC9hmIFp57b1NUqYH0EvoRkdZle 60zPgDnThwn7mZJ2zK4yjznj8qW4vVClfuXvmdMKGfkJ7OymwpgzIyHL0XH+8O8iJre/ n6kR/RFiiolnKARqV/nr9epqGjSiXWmcP2Q74=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94u432knY8tgk7HlOq97aHuakzht+YnPo8EqdpMFwzE=; b=Tsn/kcs+jdKVCRvuYKCZjIScKDuBTjNLaK67SwMoTshqJL8QQJpwkUBLZliLhZE+wO CYN3HgXPMIO62DSXpsCqqQ3hmZxZt8PaF8UrqLxUDZRDZhIFC+ggK5rEfushFPmFs7b9 +lPxOEhh9UREa3M70c7ll/7Hg6WDsiQC90MXxEWB/f+uNuRiuDVtiPjQoChderwqX7BU yIUvQDkPe6hPOA/6XG7zdTyHk8EJQtR7h6E57HE6LqxuLhRuh9038RsLVyJ3wMAVUwZx a+0nZc4YEBniQLW15ZnbPPYNeT3vT+TyTpX2ApNt5mcyDthqDOKkycDQoUTdfeDrtCpU 8SvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkWXlCaLHQkXi49MTNPVtFO+0WWxnoQQSyZ0u/9mhveye4hmefAws/26rw3l/GlaKPn
X-Received: by 10.28.109.146 with SMTP id b18mr4650707wmi.108.1476867432350; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 01:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a04:a40:1000:e0:75c5:5e17:77bf:7ea5? ([2a04:a40:1000:e0:75c5:5e17:77bf:7ea5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm67591522wjh.9.2016.10.19.01.57.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 01:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <CAEK7mvoXqyX3cADJytjU+C158EULgPLbzAb5kiUN=8WWxhi29Q@mail.gmail.com> <78301.1476524467@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvomoxSqTs5APVj=ZzG2wDz24PhJtsSibGQq2oGkv-zcLg@mail.gmail.com> <48285.1476737617@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvr_RWR6RbeXE47Ap4Vh21anu5mHTqaxbwtTmA1ZLQ1dmQ@mail.gmail.com> <48364.1476738075@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvp5zDw7uo6ZP3KOhQiWWDuoEBAay5wPWYRgpoCNgnsidw@mail.gmail.com> <48410.1476738879@critter.freebsd.dk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172343280.30521@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Cc: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <2234bba0-5100-e5f5-ee9e-da81bafe1235@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:57:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172343280.30521@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=fbraun@mozilla.com; helo=mail-wm0-f53.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.445, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bwmgt-0005dp-T2 a59a51abcf079dcf5217019cc8ff3520
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/2234bba0-5100-e5f5-ee9e-da81bafe1235@mozilla.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32630
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 17.10.2016 23:43, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
>> Do you really still see HTTP/0.9 reponses in the wild ?
> 
> Yes. Of course subject to debate around what "in the wild" means...
> 

There was a recent security bug with regards to HTTP/0.9 compat [1] that
suggested a coordinated fix among multiple browsers. Browser vendors
decided that they'd start off killing HTTP/0.9 compat on non-standard
ports only, because overall usage was still too high.
Firefox has HTTP 0.9 usage data[2] and so do other browsers. Please
chime in.

Hope that helps,
Frederik



[1] See entry in Bugzilla with links to Webkit and Chrome bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262128
[2] I'm new to our telemetry dashboard, so maybe there could be a more
useful graph than this one
 https://telemetry.mozilla.org/new-pipeline/dist.html#!cumulative=0&end_date=2016-09-22&keys=__none__!__none__!__none__&max_channel_version=release%252F49&measure=HTTP_09_INFO&min_channel_version=null&product=Firefox!Fennec&sanitize=1&sort_keys=submissions&start_date=2016-09-16&table=0&trim=1&use_submission_date=0