Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F65721E80CF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhyG588AhoIc for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9601421E80A8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SOyc5-0000sz-Jb for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:58:33 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1SOybw-0000r5-5R for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0000
Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.216.50]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1SOybt-0003S1-36 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:58:22 +0000
Received: by qafl39 with SMTP id l39so2087460qaf.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=O7WPvQs6f9XZd6ohHmBtVe+8LIdyEeKsYCFtlIRQE/w=; b=VmSzhUGek7+xGxsE93MbDh8j2GMxK6wjZ0gvdACpbjS+TNjTa9NNUoH0bijKCbqjxV 0dldRv59dI6Vq/AzteyG8HMy88O2ScBkcn1KJKE5Bxw2t4vatKvjdpVUs6Jp45cZx0gg hb0VQGCgPo87NGJdD8QuVblDGejdYh49mi0AQkeqc+rW3SoBhi3nuUOr/gZRT+2FUg7L EXfnCdynop8zmAjptyVIfUlB3RLpDoY8WYE/emMFcxDT35JMpDibs6hqoD/hFpK0HyfJ FRpmkT+a01F8ETh4jIpaEWLYCeBsM4eFBw6Xug6bltHgQ/FLRMUSx06l7UGwx/ro42jJ 2dAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=O7WPvQs6f9XZd6ohHmBtVe+8LIdyEeKsYCFtlIRQE/w=; b=lJuagYH/xHZEV8o2+wIE1hnGccY+/8KoJnMFPWn+2XyujIok2y+sSi9n9Cm70/q38R 7E5mUteVGdGjNW+Ox/c+toNh5OEx/tP+mcY7Av+6vjDT9+pq2cN0Elx5VQeItViLEpEF q9euF/AbTtsnJbvl3kMMg1El28jpwInvW8WLewBJombLKFK2tZn2WGLnh34cymX91NCd vr2bvsMWJGHioBh+jinpplQyi6JXbu7qGVj3Epe8fxeODR8Jw3l8QbxiCZBpaCXuSTyF 3cvdyvXX6t29M7ynyzY4wG1tWSxLejyTcdJCQsqIR4dcKlokAWmfXEu/faDn6Rgx+e4b qs6A==
Received: by 10.224.196.136 with SMTP id eg8mr18937164qab.50.1335823075067; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.196.136 with SMTP id eg8mr18937153qab.50.1335823074955; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.12.11 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANmPAYGr8QDhmLR50UzWYWK_fNYzGbF_P9EN0dOadmL-wQy61g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com> <CANmPAYGr8QDhmLR50UzWYWK_fNYzGbF_P9EN0dOadmL-wQy61g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:54 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: sXuGFR6hb9e-b_ifgp2xtoHs0Eo
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYjDoRFwPJNWzRqQHdBbV+DjF0mv8OO4RWTBSmh6=Dcnxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3005ddb4dd916204beec8bc1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZyp7X6d6NvYLv0Q6b9z5YqDbtbgveO/b+NCEj5PQA5w1HEb8owPHOMsnIf/WyJ44j7/izrtdfof2WRXKDPJKMNF1yFpwqBQPv1mptWCWELsMHRGyW2L0/NNJ/yMuaQ3RIj6RfUBh5dAS5GgAczKC/QQYXPg==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.50; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qa0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1SOybt-0003S1-36 52b6f0cf71b2563dfa5381298a25adc7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYjDoRFwPJNWzRqQHdBbV+DjF0mv8OO4RWTBSmh6=Dcnxw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13499
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SOyc5-0000sz-Jb@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:58:33 +0000

On the contrary, I think it's great to have multiple proposals. If you have
your own vision for how this should work, please send it out! :) My
statement was simply an FYI, not a "back off, we've got this!"

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Perfect then I'll sit tight.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org
> > wrote:
>
>> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy"
>> internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that
>>> fall under the HTTP/2.0 category?
>>>
>>> I may have some cycles for this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
>>>>
>>>> 1. HTTP/2.0
>>>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
>>>>
>>>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>;.
>>>>
>>>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
>>>>
>>>> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
>>>>
>>>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012.
>>>> It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a  good
>>>> sense of it by then, for discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>