Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring

"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Sat, 16 August 2014 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8FF1A08C8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohqCj6tmCDFp for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF67D1A08BF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XIRTd-0003ty-3E for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:04:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:04:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XIRTd-0003ty-3E@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1XIRT9-0003sG-Ka for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:39 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1XIRT8-0003tS-8F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:39 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.60.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1897E1578; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7G03ENw008623; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:14 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-reply-to: <CAH_y2NHOspsVugNZZgvD3XMZ522PzNkTRMS1dapcRDWQCL5ZsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <38BD57DB-98A9-4282-82DD-BB89F11F7C84@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NFr16YJEsN-=zUWjEdywuLpuOVijFmybjbXZtAE4LTMdg@mail.gmail.com> <DE8B5174-864A-4514-B2DC-6F1742535A8C@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NHOspsVugNZZgvD3XMZ522PzNkTRMS1dapcRDWQCL5ZsQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8621.1408147394.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:14 +0000
Message-ID: <8622.1408147394@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.062, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XIRT8-0003tS-8F ea308a767cf2456124b198d5c889ed79
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8622.1408147394@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26627
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

--------
In message <CAH_y2NHOspsVugNZZgvD3XMZ522PzNkTRMS1dapcRDWQCL5ZsQ@mail.gmail.com>
, Greg Wilkins writes:

>ie the overwhelming response to BCP188 should be that this is not a problem
>we can fix on our own, but we are prepared to be part of the solution.

Agreed, but I think we should also point out that defending against
the 'pervasive' aspect is much cheaper than "real" privacy.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.