Re: Alt-Svc WGLC

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 14 January 2016 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DC71A1B5A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKWXXAbUzf0I for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0261A1B20 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aJYDT-0007ad-Fu for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:04:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:04:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aJYDT-0007ad-Fu@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aJYDO-0007Zn-Gw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:04:46 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aJYDJ-0005oR-U3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:04:45 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id g73so245114606ioe.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:04:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rrFn4iDOeIzjIAOgqrbwLpyAygzxhfghLVNSm9sNugE=; b=P7tgrDtKLdp+gP4xzH7PDi/0+yFNgoOzg38FgamMpTsmzHdErDlP6/xjO4KX8SVz2P VcNxTgLFtYK21xfEpSZc2Vn3nTnubeyHnDxpIiaU7KjIKHIhnxlH65I7OIBBZN1zu6aX 645BMFgpW1QNBa8PpgEsmTacVUKZksIYaMYYngHADcNUoY95YJugOcN+iLZOSbcVftjz D6nFT+gWA41SyZze5th2T7WAbQnJZrl909xKKYhWEz/NHb9eh8rotDnQkaRFdZfFC+ST biMX9TKNp8QQlu3kv0v+2jR7I6RPzLWxXQuxjBwm68/8I5po9P1mYTDPNlutZ8u+aUbs K9XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rrFn4iDOeIzjIAOgqrbwLpyAygzxhfghLVNSm9sNugE=; b=hP4zPP8G+G2rFVHfe7LRiyaRPeh/m1VES0JVbuz/lLl8s/JCZ0tfjEkq2h38mnD1fd jnDvZLyUKcowLDjISY392/vLnol7NxtBcWd6LPl1OTyhGWLTGoPJCAQqsC2l+Sixwq6j Z1DtvXWA/yugytJ6ZqNcGTZYSb8gqOF+EX2hrt6b5d31fNt1jaYetHFXt/hABpbzcLtu XCGn0IJ4TGsyYHoFjMZaUTRJGIkDLGpebC/AZ4gwRVz5FmoBnKfO77Ln84xbDmFWLjC0 xW3OnaSc07LVok1mus/BDwJpTpkMZqRHvZUAIF4pFgmZLCN+iMriR5PUTvnBaH/x/nto hCMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkMfsErCy0stbXVbnpuzS+3XivfVXjENgdx55gnBudnNKXvRkVdwByVQojajZ2bHnSvP/eXyJAmVyX3w/FDRWmm/ThDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.16.199 with SMTP id 68mr2476332ioq.100.1452740656134; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.149.130 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:04:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKC-DJjRv6oFoLZzT264WFc1+3xOVr_oU-w2PbaCo+8tsask3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de> <56703332.1000006@crf.canon.fr> <56928545.7010804@gmx.de> <CAJU8_nVkibr4DsUOWjpEYOVTPbTdoWyBsgSFiRr7Rp4=qFKjPA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWu-oy9Ax1A=E+4GJ47YGKZa3SLHi0a5kendxNX=q5zaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nVyfxjiM1Q-W_CSv=B1auPXbKsDdPNibOR-GHTRjor1GA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXXGFurjCEb00KAyhyih6F=nww42MKBmYCcz4dS06r38w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nVQiaGEBtxXtHapOu0eigv=ovQSpT0DuEpkfo6tLQEEkw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWj=Xqte-XT1yVUAvLfdKT6HojMDr0SHBe9h_XbA6UAMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nXUoOEoXjrCcXYr65XoysYOfp3T2J7N2zoyBSMdAf9dnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXDi2TyvX+7XkvxJprxck7nku_XaoSOS2KpeQEBzwnweQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJjRv6oFoLZzT264WFc1+3xOVr_oU-w2PbaCo+8tsask3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:04:16 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUCY4tOOtrH8VV5yFaRQ1OhEAqvh6kV30pmtSSF8EzmVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
Cc: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.169; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-io0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.835, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aJYDJ-0005oR-U3 b3fa0dd076189f87c1a4b81390414466
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Alt-Svc WGLC
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUCY4tOOtrH8VV5yFaRQ1OhEAqvh6kV30pmtSSF8EzmVA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30924
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 14 January 2016 at 09:42, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote:
> Clients MUST NOT use alternative services
> without strong server authentication; this mitigates the attack described in
> Section 9.2.


Does this refer to the alternative service server, or the server that
advertises the alternative service?  That's a major source of
confusion here.