Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Sun, 22 March 2015 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3096C1A005B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <e0zf_wvvMYms>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains text/plain,.exe
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0zf_wvvMYms for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F22EB1A0033 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YZjMG-0007RJ-OK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:08:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:08:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YZjMG-0007RJ-OK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mcmanus@ducksong.com>) id 1YZjM9-0007Qc-Fc for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:08:09 +0000
Received: from li629-102.members.linode.com ([192.155.95.102] helo=linode64.ducksong.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mcmanus@ducksong.com>) id 1YZjM8-0003LM-CR for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:08:09 +0000
Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com (mail-qg0-f47.google.com [209.85.192.47]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AE9C3A022 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by qgf74 with SMTP id 74so3650931qgf.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.31.32 with SMTP id f32mr120930245qkf.41.1427044066245; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.115 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.115 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <38827246-43D7-425C-B841-D15252847110@mnot.net>
References: <2A565EA2-D713-478F-A771-C08202657EC2@mnot.net> <CABkgnnVQPQqpZR85a1k=zX4kt6yETzxKqqk8nJbcc0K8mo9w7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNotmQa2vSU-BebgynG2cx1UGZN50NnyNSzxGQ_0MnVSqA@mail.gmail.com> <38827246-43D7-425C-B841-D15252847110@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:07:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrdYBSZ6DhftCR+KNCCPTGJp-ZNnd3WSPG6dgz3GhzS1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147b0dca5c4f30511e396bb"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.155.95.102; envelope-from=mcmanus@ducksong.com; helo=linode64.ducksong.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.156, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YZjM8-0003LM-CR 662075b466c94a2d8a2cf10c48c45326
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #44: alt-svc frame on pushed streams
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNrdYBSZ6DhftCR+KNCCPTGJp-ZNnd3WSPG6dgz3GhzS1w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29011
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mar 22, 2015 11:32 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
> So, I think we could solve Patrick’s issue by saying:
>

Ack

>
> WRT Julian's issue, I think we could address this by changing
>

Sgtm

> """
>


> Discuss...
>
>
>
> > On 17 Mar 2015, at 12:21 pm, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Issue 44, which I raised, is specifically about the interpretation of
the origin field for pushed streams. The document already sepcifies must
ignore ignore the frame for pulled streams which specify an origin (because
the stream ID is supposed to define the origin) but it is silent about
pushed streams. I suggested must ignore for pushed streams too (when they
provide an origin) which still makes sense to me (i.e. as martin says, they
aren't special.)
> >
> > Julian added onto the issue saying we don't specify altsvc frame
handling in general (not just origin semantics) for pushed frames. Mark
seems to have coalesced those two points into this one email - I agree that
the answer for the whole frame shouldn't be must ignore assuming it doesn't
supply an origin.
> >
> > at least that's the way I unwind it.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Martin Thomson <
martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 16 March 2015 at 22:50, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > > Any objection to stating that they MUST be ignored by recipients?
> >
> > Is there any reason that server-initiated streams need to be made
> > special?  I mean, once the standard response handling has started, I
> > can't imagine any reason for treating push specially.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>