Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7105)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 13 September 2022 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B669C1533A1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 03:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETliuzE8dSrc for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 03:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CFBC14F612 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 03:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1oY33s-002Z9J-65 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:22:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:22:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1oY33s-002Z9J-65@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1oY33r-002Z8M-BO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:22:35 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1oY33p-00ETnV-Gt for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:22:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1663064541; bh=9wFgnxllUGSmOcOfbu9ALaXqVYZu+Jn92AtxT3H37sc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=D17oPpBozHkiKdPetU6NeZn5io6FG99fLi/ch8rg3IXwxVRHqNB/UfuFJvOruHxmM xA24Aftl0M9LkfyKJUqn7uBT3N1CWpEqdI+A9+dpmXAp7Ja6nUl7mFOhRMU7qVzhJ0 lnE34yb1MQpxUl5Qjv01WXsSM8olyqNZwgO6MgJE=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.179] ([91.61.59.244]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M9Fjb-1oeMUe3Oqt-006MXu; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:16:51 +0200
Message-ID: <d45e1db7-6930-0f6e-298f-8f1bbe7782be@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:16:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20220826061717.C0E3055D46@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20220826061717.C0E3055D46@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+/vCdq/DrifSe1rlxvV5yDoVH2r12SBTEE4kfPfpXWeuwoaKJSz ksvljRv7bpmV2ztTG9C5jbNYZ5RG4Duq4C5rx+eqDd7NBvs6M2mRCCzPaYHuT9TBSTix50E MdwbUsZFrntP9iZ2otopsvy8s77JlCnklOpiZ13JEiqzuzm95CXJVxPSs6DSbOmtrS/TB0s eOYCfVDzs7DJml7JVZP+Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+N3xtT3A49E=:pZl1wYO+/Qkl6nkZHssSAT 6harwKgq3xyqLBVufASUUVhQHHdWz2YtqUNBSYQ8xzQMwytjD5vlFnZdnIV5KLB6whoUxMmbu s1r8DmsMhiK8CAWnCcbtYHA7vHldP8Jhvtmo7EUCeC47VyElcKNRqAs6CP8dOBVZigfYWAT2N oO7pWCFWZYLJKWYasdvCox31xSDIyHn2/RvYxiqqmOaH4LC9iP988yoV9enh8H5diiZXyy++J ATOW1O1/eGDX1+gqLxI0iogGVyF3bjWX+I3l6OmaDEHSQVklOPP3F9KZxgUEFFAwyozQ8+qk/ 99TXiE6z1bk0N4UT12DtYkd1NP95ktn47aSeGOHd1ph4YF7MpAKboZGlsdm5KhlHkEKNR1n8u UvFZu/8gXNY5TYUtFPokJ3gVWNkmdqPe0DtXU3E7ANyM1JCyUxCq11XtbHwN0uL88V9YiVvzO KS6XonkLGltTkshQeNisko3g3IQrRWK3bZ73rj8yFzeDZNN9VjdqjCg96fou4uoyFWimjBLr2 DORNRKRfs792LX2+NCGsiem38XaTvoPlXmbWV1fWXACMtO9a7GkmN/ntUOinPljOc3lAe6JHE upmIxev6duQECH2pzXkGfZKNEqKTjUZa9UxezdOUCJOfebW1cEmmAN0ICef+Kuj7zwKxX8PGH ofZXy+yXltt7J6zHi+9zTnrPMZHPwxQ4VfZwNMR4bNPsbFNnPjAPAlm29Lwsr4QKNKBknL7ly CklSpK/n6/WWhaJiXghiEgn/ijecJmAqlqIlk0Gpl0cyJGrniAez+SPzRK6DlgkpRFuhR0t8C 9YgR/OjZdsJZs/u6kK6EOQQoIkZX1z6ilRMEOzlCKhfzG+KeQrVfZZ1/J2qB2+2MQqaeN6i24 OZIGY3iIJNfJ9qCewVzJI1R7KSWPgp5UMe6uRDOzzs8gqKBoMCs6dxRfyT5OYouBjwdoU9xyI QnumsKC0TOEs0IRajh6VbNzfCUd7naiV2ckzEWIfsyRa2hLEsCfVsEIhv6azZfd3TPwlYWQMN SV0OL52kAGInRs6H2s8PqMrk8fQ+VkEN3SRXisg90GMZ/ceogTPuEDd2Hjnxzh6YGdgTCGWOI ts7ilgoz6U0EOUqXMJubBViYq8WlXM1kG3k9FiOker7qy/owC+w7FKpPR/SHNOvdSYPmPxaX2 6wgawrUzzliE0QcJz81Y/PlhBN
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=julian.reschke@gmx.de domain=gmx.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.628, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1oY33p-00ETnV-Gt 252703202aa41704833afc12ddfcc843
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7105)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/d45e1db7-6930-0f6e-298f-8f1bbe7782be@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40389
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 26.08.2022 um 08:17 schrieb RFC Errata System:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110,
> "HTTP Semantics".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7105
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Tomoyuki Sahara <tsahara@iij.ad.jp>
>
> Section: B.1.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> B.1.  Changes from RFC 2818
>
>     None.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> B.1.  Changes from RFC 2818
>
>     The use of CN-ID has been deprecated.
>
> Notes
> -----
> In RFC2818:
>
>     If a subjectAltName extension of type dNSName is present, that MUST
>     be used as the identity. Otherwise, the (most specific) Common Name
>     field in the Subject field of the certificate MUST be used.
>
> CN-ID may be used (when a subjectAltName of type dNSName is not present).
>
> In RFC9110:
>
>     A reference identity of type CN-ID MUST NOT be used by clients.
>
> CN-ID is not used at all.  It is a change from RFC2818.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : HTTP Semantics
> Publication Date    : June 2022
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : HTTP
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

I believe thi erratum is correct - we forgot to mention the change in
"Changes from RFC 2818".

Context: <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/685>

Best regards, Julian