Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests

Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> Sun, 05 July 2020 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157A3A0ABD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlkjXCthmUER for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 13:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2066A3A0ABC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 13:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jsAli-0008L3-P2 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:57:42 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:57:42 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jsAli-0008L3-P2@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <robipolli@gmail.com>) id 1jsAlh-0008KK-K8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:57:41 +0000
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <robipolli@gmail.com>) id 1jsAlf-0003u7-Kn for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:57:41 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id a12so37258186ion.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 12:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=84HffXoJQlenZPkmUZ6ovMSHmNJJ87vHeu4XE1uGSro=; b=QGu77vGKQsQ+2b7+JCLcWYpVryClj4LZ63dF2/WYcJSKjUklpAXhAWiyH09nsBGZuZ cWZY6H72SS0WcYv50vdX8b0ymCj0ZuEFWxXSJVEf8OSOGEt65XcosYhnrqupLGp7ru3h HRWC0h+kpUgmNGOnGwpGqLtFLxoVLDDXjbqbhNEH4ZJYcehHrhITeNlLP2cUFr6TNgHb 3eFqLFOlt97L9l+sOezkLM+s0q97ZzetcXTjsWLQ0Gfa5cDzilP7yilaFNwMXETU51Yt T09xhQ78iJMXvdUrdHEgy8je1lwG7RIHj+ySGELzpTwEgLpSfoKg1jY3kJ0zOQnYpNJn OEAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=84HffXoJQlenZPkmUZ6ovMSHmNJJ87vHeu4XE1uGSro=; b=tJVcEIL5xgC/BvPbtRQSERM7v6Bhol7MQgufJesu14dchhCtNRam8ya95e81WELKAK jGm+XDwVXygDgzuIq0XwV7/8fOizeBB8J6kHfx2xr+/opuu6o88zBm5r4w8fybZQBOyV ZSQBPLXH4iLqcVLWUZFu+gyjBXUpcDQfj41QQITDdOfQWLhWxgdN9TBDVIX219r6xyzN BUi0gbKkO+gK0OUgHNNb9VW6M8zWyv8nji8S5jEsJBA/uynq4utKCxeeB5aXMNCXMubX hMleXS8+i3kaZaoW1dr6PkACk5911e9szm1DmKLMk2TWSbs/gIapbnaO9kElP1LlBjtB nxUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/RNRTaGUCrIYFiTItr+tyQsAJvt5Db/RdBm7F+ymhd5ysMdms Uf2S73G4DJjCU3C3cAAMLdJThI0P47ADEqLoKd2MTWDuJcg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNhKW0U5xtWaGO2PcWRQRccg+XF9Sh2jHXYgLYWbJ9vfSo0+qZO/Jq3fk7JA7wBDvbSpZvu5YjaK5w/9h3t3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:acc7:: with SMTP id v190mr22439307ioe.53.1593979048507; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 12:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <34df5225-0f28-2e17-0439-f51e653580b0@gmx.de> <CAP9qbHVniG0KhUEY2_kkKwGs2dcbhtMEhOnNct3kpeSYM14FcQ@mail.gmail.com> <f6e0c4a7-2112-177a-e515-af08efb7f25b@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <f6e0c4a7-2112-177a-e515-af08efb7f25b@gmx.de>
From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 21:57:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP9qbHVczDDegU_MzoOQsQ5PPTxd53=Pd_m1E9j2NqwR=E1sBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31; envelope-from=robipolli@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd31.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jsAlf-0003u7-Kn 196d2ec2e0f997991c3a6808d03edc6e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAP9qbHVczDDegU_MzoOQsQ5PPTxd53=Pd_m1E9j2NqwR=E1sBA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37840
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Julian,

I was not able to find any evidence of using parameters for digest
algorithms in the wild.

Do you agree to follow up the discussion here
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/850#issuecomment-653931895
?

Thanks for all your support,
R:



Il giorno mar 30 giu 2020 alle ore 18:31 Julian Reschke
<julian.reschke@gmx.de> ha scritto:
>
> On 30.06.2020 18:03, Roberto Polli wrote:
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > thanks for this feedback!
> > I am reading RFC 6920 but I don't find many details on representation
> > metadata and partial representation
> > (only `ct` - content-type is defined).
> >
> > It would be interesting to understand how to tie "ni:///$HASH" with
> > the other digest-algorithms in a way that it is respectful of RFC3230,
> > eg. see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1213
> >
> > When  I finish reading rfc 6920 I'll provide more feedback.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > R.
> > ...
>
> Do we have any evidence of use of parameters for digest algorithms?
>
> Best regards, Julian