IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 12 February 2024 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46A0C14F60E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 02:32:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.759
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.759 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="d3MnepJt"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="MXFeaugW"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqxDQlOv-HDz for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 02:32:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0BEC14EB17 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 02:32:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To; bh=hk+ezWLLTQ4t35xjc7ULk8nEHcm1+tlhMq2HSpZ/GxE=; b=d3MnepJty2NHieMSN1TJk/mrsc m/QpetXzqz6Cnd2CixXMn9R470Ryrod+9TB0LCH4wGlyjEihWNI1M49gPi+JcJKvxl4LTeH7wH/N5 b92VCf5JdmN8/fhb0qWXL2KuLV2m4nWutShweIpkT7vyKLbA2hAuzwRLZCMtS3WdnHrPwIFa6L4nk s31AGzu+2SS9WME4DWWppJBjhWR0moVjAuo83GZcECaqGfIp3v7hIwJMd+zfw/GjT3IfXTADNToED 43vP0WM2cZavYWE3kbv8B37eaKf2PGsR6m2uTdOOSfhl6h1H8RUrz7mMSkbyO2kQ/4bbGggH+M4AA mhunFRPg==;
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1rZTZU-00GP8l-M4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:29:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:29:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1rZTZU-00GP8l-M4@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1rZTZS-00GP7W-N1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:29:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To; bh=hk+ezWLLTQ4t35xjc7ULk8nEHcm1+tlhMq2HSpZ/GxE=; t=1707733794; x=1708597794; b=MXFeaugWVg0LX+8CIsWNavIT7AZbREZJJwWKgUgZxQOo4Zijba0zEvdxp7Oc3bOnG2EunJblb4/ pgSv1TA0K8xASM9QCR/nvq78ObAyC5xINhWxURyJysTWwB8tnm+0SGKCB6qEILXw07QdLvDUZ/qXM Qdut7pOg7aDvKO9+uKacjCMFqghHNaKNJhJrfpfwlEC+J44V2aTA07bRnOgRZYfPsQ6dAOJvccLoo nULQ3KEiEGLscXI/aqXuWef59k1pNo0ZStV+OZQCd0pq8cLwwBVNzW+HAWkGZn+rQoc3/ihHu2ypD jGJXjVDB/5e98UM6R5VYNly4fpxqEYjB5ZOg==;
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de ([2001:638:708:32::21]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1rZTZQ-00FfDX-Gj for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:29:54 +0000
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p548dcbf2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TYLLJ4f5zzDCfN; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:29:44 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <751653E8-F2B4-47ED-B4E8-414945EA6D71@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:29:44 +0100
Cc: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 729426584.014685-f494e66ca22dfeda09ac893e303b5ce2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B67A245-9E38-4D7B-A8DF-D8AA6654B8D5@tzi.org>
References: <AM0PR07MB6019C5D8DF60CE53F27E0722987E2@AM0PR07MB6019.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <56617A72-D775-41DC-88E8-3A82DC5225C7@tzi.org> <5614883D-76A9-4157-A9B6-694AB1B5FB63@mnot.net> <7E5DCED8-557C-459D-A80F-B47BF3D09998@tzi.org> <a5d724bd-d84d-4207-8bfd-3d18f1018cf0@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <751653E8-F2B4-47ED-B4E8-414945EA6D71@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:638:708:32::21; envelope-from=cabo@tzi.org; helo=smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1rZTZQ-00FfDX-Gj f075c8c710ad61ace81e82de4341b0d3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/7B67A245-9E38-4D7B-A8DF-D8AA6654B8D5@tzi.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/51768
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2024-02-12, at 00:51, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Martin. I'm happy to incorporate that approach if others don't have objections.

I don’t have any objections to what Martin said.

I would just add that I do believe that a document published in 2024 could lead the reader to the term of art “Unicode scalar value”, as suboptimal as the choice of that term may have been.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status