IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-06.txt

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Tue, 05 November 2019 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6F7120013 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:00:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCww2rhpwNdz for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AE4120024 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iRsmN-0005VW-FL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:57:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:57:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iRsmN-0005VW-FL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1iRsmL-0005TI-TG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:57:25 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1iRsmI-0007lU-Kr for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:57:25 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xA56vJG0013563 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:57:19 +0100
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:57:19 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20191105065719.GA13557@1wt.eu>
References: <157288769073.16585.14784054291482195210@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <157288769073.16585.14784054291482195210@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1iRsmI-0007lU-Kr 4f7a1f3d609282ee75a03645e023fb40
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-06.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20191105065719.GA13557@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37120
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics/
(...)

Just a heads up on this, I've spent ~45 minutes this morning having a look
at semantics and messaging. I could be reading them for hours but will not
have the time before next week. However I'd like to invite all implementers
to have a deep look into them, as these documents are of incredibly high
quality with lots of details and suggestions of seldom known corner cases.
I think that splitting messaging and semantics definitely helps fluidify
the lecture. Kudos to the editors!

Willy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email