Re: Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EB412B064 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxhRWXPLAjIT for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0FD612B05B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bZpdt-0006yq-Mv for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:27:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:27:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bZpdt-0006yq-Mv@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1bZpdo-0006xs-4Y for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:27:36 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1bZpdm-00067U-RG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:27:35 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x25so43516010qtx.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ayKL8AO8RjYW00D0pvNnVXJL5u55zds8m0aUr6rqi50=; b=jHVeAdwHYdsZ6D5+yAn8/IR0DAwHxZkA495acm0YU6emO+6cnQvZ5RsMVSEqXRekJ/ Iy/ofJ5NTyiKmBa71PpIc760DResYdDLL3rD1k/c+u/r39T2VDCrXkjOfcvnTbG0eh9d MM8WWFnCH35zrXtuspDNwkYEQ7knfpWXSFhI/ytEEGvvOmbExrcSGpBluwKUi18JCsDD bZARwcwLgoRFUsfch47rC3wklROpIinz3XRZ14Kbu3EBHy7S1aLcBdlxLCY22Sc1ZoMf so+aalzvdNRHKr8x6cm0KDPrlP/l4w7Q1p0lg/zzyx4YHYMAO5W6RFhLOXQRw2zrtln2 ljPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ayKL8AO8RjYW00D0pvNnVXJL5u55zds8m0aUr6rqi50=; b=fgstn91vkmnVV1a3782qw1HS2H4rWWkWEUNETnfHb4OzkPt0UR1EQFJnAmK2b/03Vy RosfMWzRrbMHjtKtLYklxG7Y2goP4HuEN86dZViMuZT58xUkr/GBlh21k31P5Hlp9aXs mO7aXdaZdbq8xodj2j8dnOtGgifPsdma8NVtzwX51uoNQ3ik3T1J7nb8QuR7lKc5GquB mns9OYs6QnayMzUUCC3ZgpjMheakjnqvP1hsX5kT5DLHNUOJ2dqQpjdZGjUAhEzOCaeO Ftdth+zAnpEEpyvkh+vJeb6k9wrkFK+0e4VyKsC0qh9n+w+sRcnrJ7g+a6tCmLPcfEQo dy9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutsTya/Z7zrtr8Z9AneO9CJUflLEdOH3SRh9PmggE1euKkv/Y8jTPq93/E58qAnUQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.55.215 with SMTP id e23mr42596052qtc.20.1471397228578; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.84.252.138] ([166.170.31.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm16534408qta.31.2016.08.16.18.27.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G35)
In-Reply-To: <37283331-DE52-4C78-B70D-08C11D37972C@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:27:06 -0400
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2781D689-D320-4C33-8B0A-1E300A618B71@gmail.com>
References: <e5c97630-a11f-0c93-8f4b-482764c85f71@gmail.com> <CADyWQ+FntHwanR551XtUtMQ4iw4m9RA4_0SK5zg6qvSHDs5EEw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUSQEnqFKpZPPMOyhkeQzuwdpOspiKUpbWPYCwnfQ4hCA@mail.gmail.com> <0BABA5DA-76A7-4AAF-94B2-9007A44D21C8@mnot.net> <a76832d9-ab57-f1aa-9a84-d6ddb49171ce@gmail.com> <CAOdDvNpUuaRXrqwouE+qdqMuU74=BMYQWgw+iNturUgN=TPAGA@mail.gmail.com> <37283331-DE52-4C78-B70D-08C11D37972C@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.174; envelope-from=tjw.ietf@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bZpdm-00067U-RG 9d693d8137c9327a7851e28f5375ed75
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/2781D689-D320-4C33-8B0A-1E300A618B71@gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32274
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Sign me up

Tim

From my high tech gadget

> On Aug 16, 2016, at 21:18, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 4 Aug 2016, at 1:08 AM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Alternative Approaches are always welcome.
>> 
>> As an aside, I thought draft-shane was very interesting - thanks for mentioning it here.
>> 
>> Here's what I have heard as "requirements" around dns in http in the past:
>> 
>> * a standard application developer api for lookup. Often expressed as REST/JSON
>> * a standard application developer api for publishing changes. Often expressed as REST/JSON
>> * a tunnel for the DNS protocol
>> * a push mechanism for broadcasting DNS info relevant to the http connection
>> * solid integration with HTTP caches
>> 
>> I know there have been a number of json-ification discussions in the past. Maybe its time to roll those, the DNS expertise, and the HTTP expertise into a unified effort? It seems this is an easy space to accidentally partition out to its own domain experts and end up with something that isn't satisfying to the whole. I would hope to avoid that. Tim, what are your thoughts on that?
>> 
>> Doing that is certainly a more ambitious project than just tunneling an existing protocol, but I think its potential impact is much bigger - especially if it gets the right people in the room.
>> 
>> In addition to the differing sets of requirements, I think there are different perspectives on eco-system and security impacts to be had.
> 
> +1 to that. Who'd be interested in a side meeting (Bar BoF, separate session, whatever) in Seoul? 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>