Re: Retry-After in UNIX Timestamp instead of HTTP-Date

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Mon, 05 August 2019 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD08E12019F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 05:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.201, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5j65xJMRNHq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 05:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0FA120189 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 05:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hubh6-0007YP-D1 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:02:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:02:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hubh6-0007YP-D1@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1hubh1-0007XZ-Ow for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:02:23 +0000
Received: from [116.251.193.116] (helo=treenet.co.nz) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1hubh0-00053K-8z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:02:23 +0000
Received: from [192.168.20.251] (unknown [121.98.62.26]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A31033003CC for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:01:42 +1200 (NZST)
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <CAP9qbHXfX9Y7OjfP3gEtxCtDkd1nZwe7B9CK5FY_OeKf1BQX4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=squid3@treenet.co.nz; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFiOEzoBEADuuawHiMOqHBjL5Mk6IfPCgJmY3oqJDmykzve+vDh7jArtFnOG067ftaML ligGh3y6LOLh3r1kIZ254CPHuKFYssA1p9mXL9YJnZ1qHrQVhqZwDq7dH/UtBQ2IM1QukoTo 1VRTB3ppiPHKTSa2zZ/kgBs0d+1MOi8DY2SmIDYVhUJI55qSqpxlcs6MyG4KxlEPD35J3nL4 hIzLzuzIbZoUO6M+dLvnqiFu2+mm6o75nxYmq+JCPwN5biETkSvndqr56t/W0ajlU1MpFXfO YJ8PfutrIBUPsRJUqWQjGg6uXp4torC1q2XasfSKVIQ+8duw7MCrkAfRv5BtDtpesAAsScvY TwUaDYVioiNNK1uJQZlrpYY4I0EbHI4GHKq7Q4VmotcQ2BhigqRIdh7kD3corddhlLTvTs0G 5Pjk/T2ZoMFZI03g+ieuo1l8VhCGdlqSQd8d1Np9WWwS9899QSgucwEeG+OK2f1IxxD12HiC gNoSh9id9vTYLTZK+HM1FEu+iwTxfQ9F/kDN49IaPhfvjJTs86Ov4FBTtaNUN2pF0qXpQr3A RisxZt7t7MVls+570sNnaijYYkLZdZj+49QArJxallltX3sbc9AK5JxkT8XivRCeLTKOngZE zIZCBeZuyI8cCemhU0csl89ZcORbMsgFS28FyWH4+X6lA+R5HQARAQABtCJBbW9zIEplZmZy aWVzIDxhbW9zQHRyZWVuZXQuY28ubno+iQJOBBMBCAA4FiEEAimzwkzOwlQSfJUyANhjZ5Qg vdMFAliOEzoCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQANhjZ5QgvdOKkhAAseag 7QTzRF20TDwc6QQpfYdUyuuMqyEV3AwATtJxF2Y+aF/hEHXU9XBCM8EMyiJR816haC+86Wci 0cXYj7pmR80psR9C6JoaNos89CrgsmMx9tZR5yJXrdTCnQajbZf3ozs7IDk41g4NvWg5GtHM 3MYriL0LUBXLT+YSZ9Qq2DmRZRatCjk6tiMYeHG/GtH6GZs3YExRO9Am16C1gTJRao9mJtCB DR+0NrRB2E7tKN8EZySAsZkDzbL+hL/LpdWkEZvlBsSxJebAN0x64w3FSztHGfZwLfLsxdva 6CfYs8kalHoTxRoRhpIKmTtGFJI4v9cR0+Ua5trMPgHG2QIOgXOKtOTgdYF5ksA98ZF+Odsu W7yCe9POqc4bnDbOXByxVuNMPwVSESk/GJwnxRB2vW4nywQKREJ2H6HeDO+KVhLE9nH5Alsp XpEgPpzYVeplhcKKi6H56bI0anIHvao7vEEXNP2pwRWSoMKEwGWGG7QvmemQ0YbsUqJSK563 SwNe5cVUg/Cqb08m7D9ybAm+hwgtvzU7OGsLyIHuyVxnGkB5A1GV1lizUmsFauBxyw8Yx6Gm wfmsiwEVYV/lidg+ubnsxqN7Kuvg9gYRvv+Yg1wl1QFRgeOFjbU8hj/AaNAP9SppHcA5joBe kakQx18Y6LIKKvdoepDg3mFXrOouo8i5Ag0EWI4TOgEQAMmEISQmHDde0q2YfyeA8MKejHlt 5vCldKYwtaN5ii077vJaNrQk9Q8Iym6ro0plAdtLDTzyQCATWUctF6B0VowB4/LqF40U4g+u NAj7fzC/mVvSIG42diN0pJYkcfd9ghVcF7H5CeYe2zL3TlqilqQA6Xmt6i7NmYUMO939jw7V ZszMHlqvDTUzcimKrTVB7oS3+r5v1GGT3q+utrxka3WoQ3IHnidsylbTfF+dlRsvtKWxtg8k mTgu/oj1CmUE0DQh67kXsiC3nhjdUh+eZfDGmLuOGgVAWU/WNCS3oaVxVXW3rX/nUc+URkiO CuxyPjBy+A8Z+I8OXpIaC6FQY9sCFVo7yK4UxsK+eM93mWGIc5cGBL99vr+7YgZ3TBjYrazL O5Z8wyw765G1U3dPZB+egRMEY5CO64eb78f7vbRl8/INZWdkJxcotR4weGnvOxxDHyncS3BT Su6iiqmXSz0ZDpaOdCMNDHE6Kmt1qw2NbuGUHohqg2K8+1mWnXwevS0afydoG7EX0AuE1YEf kODsek8ceFj4U2c1jlOQbuO01pHa6Z9VYn5NOwXETlIytjDyBt15R7Tt1BQQg7wU482a5SSl wXYyzOx42a2CLvZM2tXnbIY4VZDu+V1ywXNMGOs8Am1LJzi74eEv2NTbvdFMmsGAkWNWn6KS 77eR+pe5ABEBAAGJAjYEGAEIACAWIQQCKbPCTM7CVBJ8lTIA2GNnlCC90wUCWI4TOgIbDAAK CRAA2GNnlCC90zeSD/9qEpJAtuEAXyCCymUEpzN6XgSWdcYra+NolIGCRzWd3SnxtBi+zWwh LFxm8AEhfqSMRh95T4XWKHScIsZZuG9xiap5whJ5xLJC/NlZidQqiPSJLog2+Yqt+PBVPrMp aG7Cmq64Y4ttvFwLZ8Wn23irJzr9JiWvsjprImsCZbuG/I1JWHUIn70oknzsTgpTPWDCfnCi GhCK7vgXak9QgBKhrzgADK3o6uCjmNllUdci9gFzUSy4/x9x73xrbzXS8/pO23fnbBwPa7VV 9IRtOb8HJJk8Y79A1ZnkVANBo1KmE+Ycw92IMcz2ev4VFw+pbqZ/swHqa3y3L5cT7Keqgc67 wiahSZRc5zM0jJWxN//lpgcdnDRI1OSLCrMMI69yc2QMzUZu87BtEJzm0DBy2pIKEni9dSCw wMITUsU21Ny3RmaV7fmXYAyp9pcaQQWGOb2CIvU7k60eLWgfNTo5SGI56WYC+ndod7vPU+sw JVbKrQKqfwO5JbdY9YPbo++Z6kfrnbkmm3wkJ4W8dOcrkLYbmOk7sColcQhVbmGy74Ggzl75 R22Q7+Uhjj9iq0Kv3CGQ3rKVdXOfAo5OekdaMDx9t9HoirGiokcyCPTy7wAyvQ75lbrygxCm e05XBfLZHrMp+SdM8ONsdgIe7U0bI85zYegceSagzCtBdB8HQ10TFg==
Message-ID: <716beea3-d7f7-4911-18bc-a23fd6b382fc@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:01:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP9qbHXfX9Y7OjfP3gEtxCtDkd1nZwe7B9CK5FY_OeKf1BQX4A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.251.193.116; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.445, BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hubh0-00053K-8z 1bba5a4fc4cc750eb7e2ea7957b5aa0c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Retry-After in UNIX Timestamp instead of HTTP-Date
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/716beea3-d7f7-4911-18bc-a23fd6b382fc@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36932
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5/08/19 10:38 pm, Roberto Polli wrote:
> Hi @all,
> 
> While reading the Retry-After specs I was guessing...
> 
> if we had to reboot the retry-after header, would we use the HTTP-date
>  or the unix-timestamp syntax?


Why re-design it at all?

If anything reduce it to just the delay-seconds field value. That is
compatible with any time locale.

Amos