RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Mon, 11 January 2016 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74BA1A017F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:40:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-bANKIlz64N for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C241A870F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIfR4-0007vE-BF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:35:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:35:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIfR4-0007vE-BF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1aIfQz-0007uX-RS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:35:09 +0000
Received: from mail-bl2on0143.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.143] helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1aIfQw-0005eG-LW for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:35:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=11Gz5HfBrrh3o7/ReWbH1rhwm/3gagdgwsfQfhC5Zp0=; b=RPK+VaU6SMSs2ZuS7iQ0DwQgIiJ4eWqa0uPoa6XumLNYEmt94uiiidiQcIMREoZWydbR3asPs9c0jsP2VAg+LBNyPPciVnENLQvqQRsRCBb+km3c1v19a1ek7wDioApbOsWvbyld6ExGReO9hW87xGiYmN8QHeAASY4TUmd07Zs=
Received: from BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.34.153) by BN3PR03MB1365.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.34.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.365.19; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:34:39 +0000
Received: from BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.34.153]) by BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.34.153]) with mapi id 15.01.0365.020; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:34:39 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Thread-Index: AQHRQ5avnlbV6xvOh0mzY9sozPZPG57lKCYAgA/NZQCAABmfAIABhVnQ
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:34:39 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR03MB13675838E560ED08916D245187C90@BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CALaySJK5fYy_JCv0Y7Fs3QpPk95fUxyt272JMc-QUpVKO7_gJA@mail.gmail.com> <56853BCC.7030005@gmx.de> <56927D52.2000106@gmx.de> <CALaySJ+mVOHinmehK2jm3jQaEkXJZ2BRbaY4a5wuw=eOOO-A9Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+mVOHinmehK2jm3jQaEkXJZ2BRbaY4a5wuw=eOOO-A9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:600:8300:3b9a:cab:b867:a61c:cd75]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR03MB1365; 5:LHgh/NIWoIUNypwqkDO5KEvDeGb4GoVjWDU6Ly6Incy2QIrcd2yoDCbn00Q61hgU2OAmId4pTIsYbI3BGY1KFHEE4stvRLDTT6S4gQtFETDeoxKCknDQcgJVYVEbYzWP5/i3n2Bi0J1MsCjkEkwy+Q==; 24:F46iPIwKWTfvyvCmThXW/+wVVKm+RzuS8shPYWF/9II9xiov2QpvpyKJkqCmphtXCTQOAgItKSY4hcca8gaECh8WUyldvPJxySLQkPGDf/A=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR03MB1365;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f0c33c15-6882-4353-0c38-08d31aa519dd
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR03MB136519C13D34C06FD157D57387C90@BN3PR03MB1365.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BN3PR03MB1365; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR03MB1365;
x-forefront-prvs: 0818724663
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(13464003)(377454003)(189002)(93886004)(50986999)(86612001)(5005710100001)(2900100001)(10290500002)(15975445007)(10400500002)(2906002)(77096005)(8990500004)(122556002)(5002640100001)(76176999)(4326007)(101416001)(5008740100001)(19580405001)(33656002)(5004730100002)(19580395003)(92566002)(87936001)(74316001)(54356999)(106116001)(76576001)(105586002)(99286002)(5001960100002)(40100003)(86362001)(81156007)(230783001)(586003)(5003600100002)(97736004)(106356001)(189998001)(11100500001)(10090500001)(1220700001)(5001770100001)(6116002)(2950100001)(1096002)(102836003)(7059030)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR03MB1365; H:BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jan 2016 16:34:39.2871 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR03MB1365
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=65.55.169.143; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.748, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aIfQw-0005eG-LW b4d1b92068a92b285cc6d58dc0650071
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN3PR03MB13675838E560ED08916D245187C90@BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30886
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Haven't heard back from Stephen on the port-change issue we wanted him to weigh in on; I sent him a reminder.

-----Original Message-----
From: barryleiba@gmail.com [mailto:barryleiba@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org; HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10

>>> I don't think this is a 2119 "MAY": what *else* can it do?  You have 
>>> no other guidance about which alternative alternative to pick, 
>>> so....  I think this should just say, "it chooses the most suitable...."
>>
>> Agreed. I haven't changed that yet as it affects normative language 
>> but I will unless somebody wants to defend it soonish.
>
> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a9df1e33703a2cb46c9b
> 441bfca5bbc04fff80d1>

Nice.  Is this the last of the updates, or are we still working on any?  Whenever you're ready to post a new I-D version, I'll give it a check and request last call.

Barry