Re: #440: max of max-age
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 07 May 2013 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D70D21F9348 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 22:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cg+xPjcuBiIq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDC621F8DBB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZaR0-0007v2-J9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 05:27:30 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 05:27:30 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZaR0-0007v2-J9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1UZaQr-0007uJ-5Y for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 05:27:21 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1UZaQq-0006XH-5k for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 05:27:21 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.10]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LuJ7B-1USgWn0bQ7-011nFx for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 07:26:54 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 May 2013 05:26:53 -0000
Received: from p5B231CDA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO netb.Speedport_W_700V) [91.35.28.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 07 May 2013 07:26:53 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19u3zQa4LJusy+w87ENMIQ950VC1Qtkt+USVqG2Op g9QKh23VtslNfd
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 07:26:54 +0200
Message-ID: <er3ho8dhoph5l3vc312hb8nb9b370679g6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <749A83AB-1927-48F5-A1E5-B652A45F03B4@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <749A83AB-1927-48F5-A1E5-B652A45F03B4@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=derhoermi@gmx.net; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.783, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.234, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZaQq-0006XH-5k afea2a9d4e9daf5c923c38fa819054cb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #440: max of max-age
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/er3ho8dhoph5l3vc312hb8nb9b370679g6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17860
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
* Mark Nottingham wrote: ><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/440> > >Bjoern, > >Are you suggesting that we should change the max to 2**31-1? > >If so, happy to discuss it (think it would be easy). I don't want to >include text to rationalise it, though, as we don't do so elsewhere, and >it really isn't necessary. I would not have commented if it was 2^31 - 1, but I am not suggesting anything; for all I know the text could be using 2^31 because everyone copied some bizarre bug back in the 1990s and now we are stuck with it. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- #440: max of max-age Mark Nottingham
- Re: #440: max of max-age Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: #440: max of max-age Mark Nottingham