Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY

Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> Sun, 26 May 2013 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0A821F8FF8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EbNEPgtAvqx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B3221F8FF3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UgbmZ-0005tI-83 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:18:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 14:18:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UgbmZ-0005tI-83@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jpinner@twitter.com>) id 1Ugbm9-0005sQ-SX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:18:21 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jpinner@twitter.com>) id 1Ugbm4-00054a-4n for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:18:20 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n9so8022503oag.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=twitter.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gmwJ4PJqKdAAbP3VSHe6o5QIv45bmcNYaF96GlcrvyQ=; b=DqR/Zchvtctm6SzrJEPa83NLbtqNVCpsJ1fWaiGrRTktmgfLFMjU1XrrbmvOMDuxvU zoCYEDVpQhKUNyie/EseqreXouC/IFSo8CaXDskg8MKZdE4BpxtOxa51XZbyQ/RgdW+Y eCHCKApl8BNcM9mz8bN6NKMWyLGl8MYc8MbPQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=gmwJ4PJqKdAAbP3VSHe6o5QIv45bmcNYaF96GlcrvyQ=; b=KHlBjj3T8UI4IJt9sml+Dh/FZ7DYUREnHpW28KmTr5EZLj1b/fjkusWo4357ikazOj iKSigZogcuk0e8XMI3b/H3CmtUnQM5ZgwSMQyEgR0+YsKO/LuBhGerkUUA0H6p0SXfh8 3FYglU2+gipkQJF+CcQR08H2wTHSGBfgDGiau3ccAaVyqU2VmqaWr9LiEHDn23kaFtBg XerlKGTYjrx5c5CKX+NsuKgjE/aiWPAD/8yObGHeVAaE5paWArt/HtyHG50pb+c/Oxc0 THHEg+lnxILKEkS+1uVF9otWoW8/ICmgukxaXKcUpCIoLW0R0Ywcx5Snl2GwKV6AgBMc FuJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.17.231 with SMTP id r7mr16500472oed.13.1369577869829; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.89.230 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNosf2wV18caAuR20uskp82xpZH5BXYt7SNezG1aTG09=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbfX_H_7dwM7ExL5qJgpV5JN1NYyv9tqnu_E23qGk63mWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhDhoS+BNknRnYLAOXfWzumcjkWnQnM=NkNM8oqqE=atw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNqkuY5qtOzFz5J0v1F1_n8HmFY9J==sXMs_9tDrTTE=cg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhZb_ScYZ=F8ypGkXkX=3oK+4TnyWOtuN_FNkZqqhbZLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbeAwrT15QKn5kL0=w+V0zBgObe_pOzT-NxbwSrZ_RyA+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNd95pXcPM1OiG2qjOyXKV80noh2frdEbORwe6HxsgeK3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfOWdaOVeVSmnrqUtHM5F8=xjLauDBoRbpijWsWxyK+rw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_g892Cr1B8GtN01j1GArU0+Mkoya2UAAb893ZrfKdyeEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNe4=hVsm3sNerAdELECHz_2m8aWOLK-Kif-JVz_G=HyKw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+pLO_jaDNWyZyxsWVQ2YuBG8kuZjo1KovmBVfa2d9vVYb56dg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNd0AZEDXvTD7uvEgFK-4GRShj9tEcam0C68t4S_ySTNUw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNosf2wV18caAuR20uskp82xpZH5BXYt7SNezG1aTG09=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 07:17:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_gM1A4Xa-xWeTzWv-DQT-vNs-ZJ-XmXLhE=aM6QE9ZxCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012946846c784204dd9fb2a7
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9uZXQUZnyPiQkyG0yTKsXtanrXjeob5O/L7c71OELUCHW//HpwL2HQ3pzAlBsNnWLV1rS
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.41; envelope-from=jpinner@twitter.com; helo=mail-oa0-f41.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.100, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Ugbm4-00054a-4n d41c433e9e1a6401531e9f357361a348
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Design Issue: Separate HEADERS and PRIORITY Frames, Eliminate HEADERS+PRIORITY
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+pLO_gM1A4Xa-xWeTzWv-DQT-vNs-ZJ-XmXLhE=aM6QE9ZxCg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18098
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>wrote;wrote:

> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nah-- I've been proposing that when the continuation bit is set, you may
>> ONLY continue sending HEADERS frames for that stream until the set of
>> headers is done (at which point you can send whatever again), basically
>> because of both complexity and the DoS stuff inherent in incomplete state.
>> :)
>>
> +1 on this
>

+1 yes to this