IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00

Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp> Fri, 06 February 2015 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BD61A1AC9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:31:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_SbtlO-subX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E684F1A6EFE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YJqRJ-00053s-TQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:27:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:27:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YJqRJ-00053s-TQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>) id 1YJqRA-000532-Gb for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:27:40 +0000
Received: from na3sys010aog104.obsmtp.com ([74.125.245.76]) by maggie.w3.org with smtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>) id 1YJqR7-0007OR-LE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:27:40 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob104.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVNUxsRwvI9QtigZRCxMtBd0wTUdYdsKk@postini.com; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:27:37 PST
Received: by labhs14 with SMTP id hs14so3769132lab.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aist.go.jp; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9tBgSC24UmJh7x+p+n5pz9cnu2Eqn0154yW7XgAP+rA=; b=DO/w2bSz7p48Cs+dwr2MR1eqcbemIx8a4Jq2BsVJjqrhFcaP6ByqS30w6FqhZq38j/ ancEprd2LsM/i88r1bVBrMbqrOgCLLpubGTEMgKHj0nQPXQxbjs6DH31WLMRIfTjalCy 1AfccXYnDp2F6v1kWz1RZeGJg2uw5yKXz9Agw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9tBgSC24UmJh7x+p+n5pz9cnu2Eqn0154yW7XgAP+rA=; b=lUqYQvl12q0GN1rLSx2suBKo0PeQf5GkEb9XYXsslDAl5Wd6P5qB5fTkhXBrvL47Yj 9z53gcDnc9zoqYOrYx6A3lDhknIGlhDxWQ1MXMGYa4gXYs/7/4TYc6uWpeO+Xquc3fKA sDW+xiSnwEROU4ysvIGSAEJvMJC45cayJ4xeiG04lYTHEy08j04avNnUxJ8tlTz/bHqW pUU9yp28xDSJPRHBdWUopzNv0sDabGoFdrjoRGaX/8abLqH7RQAXqZ3HdmKE29ScsrAl BmnBPICHfianKl8nDShiWJzR+LrmF4f/5Z3QhMtvvDc7OANkxsfAc2hwilXOnGbMTTIl Ej8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7ONXEJP1WxP5GLEcq70WtBeHbDGuOOGnVPFpmn3GNv3Z+mqzTm/IqICZydj70KQuNrQOtV95c5PB5rsaFXlhvbqc3TK4qEQIEe/eiywww9jjwmGPGfhNq1r0XxOLmWrrkML8mchQVW5vCTj4pWEnBfs2+zA==
X-Received: by 10.112.235.194 with SMTP id uo2mr4975611lbc.57.1423258032507; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.235.194 with SMTP id uo2mr4975602lbc.57.1423258032367; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.83.203 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.83.203 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54D4E1D2.7020702@isode.com>
References: <1BA93C83-91E9-4E7D-88CE-ADC8C39091C6@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXhg55e5N2O8yZJpTbz4qSm0-KpVApyDha_snetrFqvMw@mail.gmail.com> <54C9E419.1070407@greenbytes.de> <54CB7A4F.7090402@crf.canon.fr> <54CB7F48.4060800@gmx.de> <CAGL6epLUkFi6amhExWASqjS5Mvs1MVTJ1hDmhBTncznQV1GK1A@mail.gmail.com> <54CBFB6E.9070800@treenet.co.nz> <54CF7E9B.2060700@gmx.de> <CAGL6epL_XLY+ZeLPi3XVJsdaoSYFwhJuuy7zDeLspJ0tMfKvKw@mail.gmail.com> <54D24CFC.20709@gmx.de> <54D490F3.60903@gmx.de> <54D4E1D2.7020702@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:27:12 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMeZVwuFg=RoiZJohzxpiOtG=ARE6ZPaY6ktKv=PgOyGzGZRyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c315e87185c1050e72150f"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.245.76; envelope-from=y.oiwa@aist.go.jp; helo=na3sys010aog104.obsmtp.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.030, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YJqR7-0007OR-LE 56f3aad3ef73ff7552c50f5acb83d864
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAMeZVwuFg=RoiZJohzxpiOtG=ARE6ZPaY6ktKv=PgOyGzGZRyA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28772
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm fine, too.

-- 
Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp> on mobile
2015/02/07 0:47 "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>:

> On 06/02/2015 10:01, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> On 2015-02-04 17:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-02-02 15:08, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>>>
>>>> This document does not define any semantics associated with these
>>>> header, which means that the document that uses these header will be the
>>>> one that must address the information leak issue.
>>>> I do not see why we would restrict a future use of these headers based
>>>> on the Digest usage; this seems odd to me.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>   Rifaat
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, the goal for me was not to define anything new, but just to
>>> extract what we have already into something that can be maintained
>>> separately from DIGEST. As such, Hervé's comment made sense to me, and I
>>> updated the editor's copy accordingly:
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-
>>> auth-info-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe other potential users of Auth-Info (Yutaka & Alexey) could state
>>> whether having this constraint would affect their ability to use
>>> Authentication-Info?
>>>
>>> Assuming that is not the case, I'd like to declare victory, submit a new
>>> draft, and ask Mark to start a WGLC...
>>>
>>> Best regards, Julian
>>> ...
>>>
>>
>> Seeing no additional feedback, I went ahead and submitted draft 01.
>>
> I think your definition would work for the SCRAM draft.
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status