Re: Adding user@ to HTTP[S] URIs

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Mon, 27 January 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E1A120271 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:34:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf53nn-Gp4uW for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:34:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D528912080C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:34:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iw6Nb-0002Nd-2b for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:32:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:32:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iw6Nb-0002Nd-2b@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1iw6NZ-0002LR-Bq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:32:45 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1iw6NX-000064-V0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:32:45 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00RFWYct030403; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:34 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:34 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Cc: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>, Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>, "HTTPbis WG (IETF)" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20200127153234.GA30398@1wt.eu>
References: <5E2C4738.8010609@openfortress.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001251614520.15685@tvnag.unkk.fr> <5E2C65D7.7030408@openfortress.nl> <4859592D-1B93-49E0-9661-5E24FDAC276F@bzfx.net> <5E2D630A.604@openfortress.nl> <CAEaz5mtYyvei8wxb4_1H36N2PkrU+-47uqn2KtitqMtd9LRwsQ@mail.gmail.com> <5E2ED158.1030909@openfortress.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001271319120.18042@tvnag.unkk.fr> <5E2ED7B0.6040606@openfortress.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001271333070.18042@tvnag.unkk.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001271333070.18042@tvnag.unkk.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1iw6NX-000064-V0 093d06c9e74860cfceab993dd00bbbba
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Adding user@ to HTTP[S] URIs
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20200127153234.GA30398@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37306
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Rick van Rein wrote:
> 
> > Browsers have no consistency in this usage pattern, so this is
> > definately a niche.
> 
> Yes, but a niche with potentially a large amount of users.
> 
> And in fact, it sends the user name without a password in a HTTP header,
> which is... well, what you ask for. =)

Actually the only valid use case I've ever had for user[+pass] in URIs
were for FTP URIs that I was typing in browsers (or following links to
download stuff from various places). I'm not even sure browsers still
support FTP URIs nowadays ;-)

Willy