Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns

"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Sat, 13 July 2013 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E021F9E6A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KIZXOLSWxyID for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09F21F9E69 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Uy4sQ-0000hZ-IF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:49:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:49:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Uy4sQ-0000hZ-IF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1Uy4sI-0000ea-A8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:48:54 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1Uy4sH-0001oY-NP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:48:54 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CC33EB33; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:48:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6DImVHl006824; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:48:32 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Mark Delany <s2y@romeo.emu.st>
cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In-reply-to: <20130713182902.69380.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <CAP+FsNdcYhA=V5Z+zbt70b5e7WmcmXgjG5M9L3vfXeXfTwmRnw@mail.gmail.com> <51DE327C.7010901@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnXeqD6wh0dcJ1Dz=4PLAJNkDeGcCuzMr9ATd_7xS7nbGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbcUkLf3CTAB4jwicnsiKWLGVY6=hX0k=0256SR_gcVt9A@mail.gmail.com> <092D65A8-8CB7-419D-B6A4-77CAE40A0026@gmail.com> <3835.1373612286@critter.freebsd.dk> <CD9E163F-1225-4DA8-9982-8BDBD16B1051@mnot.net> <1772.1373629495@critter.freebsd.dk> <20130712125628.GC28893@1wt.eu> <881777F8-86A7-4943-9BBD-8EB2DC306834@gmail.com> <20130713182902.69380.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:48:31 +0000
Message-ID: <6823.1373741311@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.364, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Uy4sH-0001oY-NP 7cab9b7c963f54b5c861d58a9de7d3e3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP router point-of-view concerns
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6823.1373741311@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18748
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In message <20130713182902.69380.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net>, "Mark Delany"
 writes:

>   Client -> sessionid -> Edge --sessionid+Cookies--> origin
>                           |
>                           ^
>                           |
>                    | Cookie Jar |
>                           |
>                           ^
>                           |
>   Client <- sessionid <- Edge <--New Cookies-- origin

Yes, that's the obvious backwards compatibility design, except
that for "Edge" you might often just read "apache" or "ngnix".

>The benefit being that you achieve perfect cookie compression on
>your external links without inventing a fancy compression system.

Good way to express it.

>The argument being that the big guys get the most benefit, ergo they
>should bear the cost?

It could actually be interesting if somebody would go through their
HTTP/1.1 traffic and estimate how much bandwidth would be saved.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.