Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 29 January 2020 06:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995831201DB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:43:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=I8ZuE7gU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dUh0VWqH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vvQP3N9Y1oLe for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207D71201E5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iwh1U-0003nh-To for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:40:24 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:40:24 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iwh1U-0003nh-To@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1iwh1S-0003mw-P7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:40:22 +0000
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1iwh1R-0007Ai-08 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:40:22 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB88520840; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:40:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:40:17 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=r d97Ri1lAjTF+CxDxolAbrni8v56rp569vSSL5kGiL4=; b=I8ZuE7gUzHVf/o1EI NcNMN5Bh6kWeIGUYmYBXUr81bl+ux/cXIdssvRfZb02dhEc+nWFtToKM1eJLv3wO lRbgFMDDg7NXP1s3znew39QTjYvJ8YRc9nBfRtpu5BTaFTAW1jyV4fdM6Pyc9pa3 4cpf7ddEzIH3Bts2k+x1Jo3UskuYEyN9gcLvB3Fyf2A54m2HcoJn/FqQUiXpmy5/ I83r8S/MNukUWIgOcmJEWdWkpKPJw/7cHVfbnEpDT3HulFjwTYP+kNQaoVSIQ8Wv 6f3yWlJU46TwtKZky4XyN+QNof8SyuLXZ3cfrLtDxW1edUgOQ/fwL++rXe0baeGq iAoFw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=rd97Ri1lAjTF+CxDxolAbrni8v56rp569vSSL5kGi L4=; b=dUh0VWqHoaLUa3J0O/m9rIPFqj8MO7s7WmcfJaXuOLOqVjMP0+V0clOV5 7hgGvMalHsdTn1Y3/BhyYuuca0qYMjXxhkIsW+oRcZGYUTDU18SN9iMAi1XRrC+r LA9+G9KYbA8cVDUhk+yeemFlHxRSS5ljVs8ve5WYio6Zyft/olrf4Rt5keBdYD/T s/Hpvya0jWIOosmG5Xy1mrpIO1PtmMbBH4Uap4p7xtsVeHHNtSxhgQ5ZIk/J70Z6 DIiAcc9ZMuTL3LQgV9boNmN/jM49gRyQuN+hCkhA99QNVjri7Zm+KrwZfqSJRgNF /ZH4WwL8xxcARDz0z9b5KxuZl0X0w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:zygxXiv6_pgogLJqxLzsNGlUzp-fIFlo0Hh6BNrEWGbIJ1wGf96Z6Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrfeehgdekkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:zygxXulXFpZZzRqvCoR7WiSfxgecKcfBxzVfsUXGFfwppjB3npRP4Q> <xmx:zygxXgJBJQPRpnkER-y0dQnrsY_yg5i9-JcFmrcNs677kcS58daZ0A> <xmx:zygxXm5kfDb0tT6SsYwrkvF-8UG6gxnzmxTfkhbn5FKhuDqnc67p7Q> <xmx:0SgxXsuigXfVvIaLVLPipiBOQQ-58LfPvgVPxOk_OlT145UrBj0YvA>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E67EF3060BD1; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:40:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9feb1c80-7e96-87e6-9106-3b1a0ebf3290@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:40:09 +1100
Cc: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <89107F6C-7F2B-4115-AEC5-00CB21E7F344@mnot.net>
References: <20200123155840.241DDF406CD@rfc-editor.org> <FF06904B-55AC-46C6-A20B-68FF435C98DC@mnot.net> <5E2A1D7A.1030600@openfortress.nl> <6387E079-ED85-4A3F-BD3F-CA71367BEC0E@mnot.net> <9feb1c80-7e96-87e6-9106-3b1a0ebf3290@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iwh1R-0007Ai-08 6bc26e600ec3b4365127343a78070466
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/89107F6C-7F2B-4115-AEC5-00CB21E7F344@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37309
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Fair enough. > On 29 Jan 2020, at 5:39 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 23.01.2020 23:29, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> >> I'm saying that those documents are actively under revision now, so the appropriate place to discuss it is in that effort, not as an erratum against the soon-to-be-obsoleted specification. >> >> Cheers, > > Yes. > > But we have to deal with the erratum in any case. I believe that what > RFC 7230 says is intentional, so within the scope of the erratum we > should deal with adjusting the prose referring to RFC 3986. Thus "Held > For Update". > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Rick van Rein
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Rick van Rein
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964) Rick van Rein