Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 27 March 2015 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1292C1A89BB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfZxOJnhhvE0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD001A8927 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YbYed-0004SU-0b for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:06:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:06:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YbYed-0004SU-0b@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1YbYeW-0004Rb-DF for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:06:40 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1YbYeV-0000qQ-B7 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:06:40 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id t2RI64B8027482; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:06:04 +0100
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:06:04 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20150327180604.GA25871@1wt.eu>
References: <F30E70B3-14F0-47F7-8228-98527034A5CC@mnot.net> <emfb77a216-c881-4ccc-b0ac-177521265d55@bodybag> <20150327064939.GA25606@1wt.eu> <CABkgnnXWJLqssidLV6mZW_FxrXALhuJ2gUjZeAj0xxtsUoAZPA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXWJLqssidLV6mZW_FxrXALhuJ2gUjZeAj0xxtsUoAZPA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.019, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YbYeV-0000qQ-B7 d95c20aa4ed8d7984b5fccd51ea155aa
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150327180604.GA25871@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29039
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Martin,

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:53:03PM -0500, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 27 March 2015 at 01:49, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> > I'm fine with several proposals, as long as there's the ALPN name in
> > the header name to indicate that whatever value is advertised must be
> > a valid, registered ALPN token.
> 
> Would everyone be OK with the following header field name: "ALPN" ?

No objection from me, it seems to clear the confusion and address your
needs at the same time.

Thanks,
Willy