Re: Possible ambiguity in RFC 6265bis
Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Tue, 30 July 2024 21:36 UTC
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) id 820CAC169429; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81644C169427 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.758
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="Z2ZTl9NX"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w3.org header.b="EAOoVF8E"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2qXx1h-rAS7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mab.w3.org (mab.w3.org [IPv6:2600:1f18:7d7a:2700:d091:4b25:8566:8113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89F5C1654F2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To; bh=OPSTro/xmGPe+gYKz5z3+7n8zMcZPtKNbQvk+o5+TWU=; b= Z2ZTl9NXf8rfVj+84+ssP6MHAVVHRlDNNus8haDPhnEpPxfcRfWAHjP9t1UhpYbLTHIJCBkuakZjy LF3+wimMQVOm5dJyqTATuStAiismkyfQC9/IHUbDU1Wa+3r52/3ADzwWamghchvbEpUUosDLGA22C 8txtdpXXYBWDtOrNh+81jQHZa06X+Biy3zbTp+lm+Q4/996kxHbLuKqDFKMjKcxkCZv0Au/SEfKIl tNwNKC4Aqz6zbU2yiKmbKAE/O6ulPVsCGEjGnfcjBIFCtlD8aBQifCpjpO02FvyIr74mR4uUlAKtD qO1oI/ubyxADsJpaY9pI33UXVcG64TD8gw==;
Received: from lists by mab.w3.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1sYuUl-002ea0-1D for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:34:59 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:34:59 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1sYuUl-002ea0-1D@mab.w3.org>
Received: from ip-10-0-0-144.ec2.internal ([10.0.0.144] helo=pan.w3.org) by mab.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1sYuUj-002eZ5-1B for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.internal; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:34:57 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject: cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To; bh=OPSTro/xmGPe+gYKz5z3+7n8zMcZPtKNbQvk+o5+TWU=; t=1722375297; x=1723239297; b=EAOoVF8E1LC1PQzYQYrhaqm2alXNZ+K3/fCn1Av5ApPz4xQ bYo292phiBbCyLGd6K9hcY16L/UfNFDH0p/yVM0jpAtouCPa4E3oxkxffZn1MGXqCLll165/hSuSG 4bZC1Z1RWGvA2Jdci8NdUVu8jj9JynzqLk8ziy1Dl+t/tssjNCXqa6BHyiX5uRisyP51p6npgUXOq LFB5ZDF0unlI1R4r95yRU8Ur7GJrQvnbJWlX6DZeVCGX8FyJyq9Brx1yvVckvAyH515eMF6V+evmy 2GZdD+FLGG7OjPKye5FGfcGvUWR70Vs9OR4vh6KubW799rDZMYMQTPS4nMUHJJRg==;
Received-SPF: pass (pan.w3.org: domain of haxx.se designates 2a02:750:7:3305::2aa as permitted sender) client-ip=2a02:750:7:3305::2aa; envelope-from=daniel@haxx.se; helo=silly.haxx.se;
Received: from silly.haxx.se ([2a02:750:7:3305::2aa]) by pan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1sYuUi-00ErCi-1Y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:34:57 +0000
Received: by silly.haxx.se (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 958CD629E9; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:34:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silly.haxx.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C5E7FFB4; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:34:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:34:51 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
To: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <2842b8da-90db-4e4a-97f6-837f3aa023c0@apache.org>
Message-ID: <85n7s3oq-4s7q-8r7n-9q5n-9rp475902206@unkk.fr>
References: <2842b8da-90db-4e4a-97f6-837f3aa023c0@apache.org>
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DMARC_MISSING=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: pan.w3.org 1sYuUi-00ErCi-1Y 5ee22fab0d6568631236be2ca35aa423
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Possible ambiguity in RFC 6265bis
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/85n7s3oq-4s7q-8r7n-9q5n-9rp475902206@unkk.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/52166
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024, Mark Thomas wrote: > If I haven't missed a previous discussion, I assume the correct thing to do > would be to raise an issue in GitHub. Is that correct? I see someone else just did: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2848 -- / daniel.haxx.se
- Possible ambiguity in RFC 6265bis Mark Thomas
- Re: Possible ambiguity in RFC 6265bis Daniel Stenberg