Re: what's up with commenting on http/2 github issues

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Wed, 24 April 2013 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113CA21F8F58 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h6aL22W4lpLD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E14E21F8C08 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UUtLH-0006vM-7q for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:38:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:38:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UUtLH-0006vM-7q@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UUtLC-0006uQ-Rt for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:38:06 +0000
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UUtL9-0004K3-8z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:38:06 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id d10so757824qca.37 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iv1oytadsG3RKfdj+mGxFiG8hQRf3KyjkEw/ByXV6dw=; b=cu+hfWCaTj7dY7lFuBJbMbEigTHr87fhi/2PjgSXFIiOdUHDjuRV+Ul3OZcewXFHNu yg2Jg2mCa3pYyzNLBZwi2aYUv9JJl2wiGph/8dP6eWzCeMyTxSf7tDs32nXvQ5Jd2B06 5axz4zPsA39Ue9xQa5yJUgKEbGFCZshuvBU8UJeRjEOlhqQmAHdqvWPGc89sN3jVIHgZ lerKDemlzkP4tMn+7AoG+pRmH0Ewcil4Go5jcZT65j8fQw2Vy5M4G+n8XYjxbR0zy7YF m53w4oGqxUqQXggHxC1uv89THtISIxXAdXhXcIVyKJV0V6pFiygg+g+yo+VFoOTreQs4 MixA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iv1oytadsG3RKfdj+mGxFiG8hQRf3KyjkEw/ByXV6dw=; b=dU86hLRNi3TL/H9J/9zIS4lOTWA/aryrNAfuZGmEn+0YDb9zT9pqE9Ukpg76QLJ/mM SauKaXTOfuEcJtMm8bgrmeC7xeyrWd+thgaojWwjMbuHZc++tq7GIyoVZPf5Aq4IW/Mp R0ex/GNY6+xlEEBnZpE7uc6kpgZUAGIJLSsr8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=iv1oytadsG3RKfdj+mGxFiG8hQRf3KyjkEw/ByXV6dw=; b=p4bXRJIQNKZRF4U+Sm/oZ1E0QqjaNAoJSEIqpj4BbfXsy9U1HvAKzYqHdNxqHNgIPb F2mpgbN+r+EJgwojcSL+vmOLRgq4dR/cVQKggMeE3riouxAgwfWtk773qEkj7Kef519l o/yr6ccHA6FJEVJeCXisMC7sRz3kaeT13bR47hwhInVcj+qSCe+eo+rrxvNf0pB+NeZx fD6DzcyN5hs+3jdfKrgSKgJPiWIhpCtwNmwGjEdm08B42Eh+gHdegHpG7/p+X81ZeJS5 CRXo4cECjaezlPrWGz5ZMgDirrXMOD2bPkNLcJfgzBbJjhAMQHmRLa95rM+Ub/8Odzd7 yNsw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.19.3 with SMTP id a3mr20831393qee.22.1366785457664; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.180.4 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51777949.2000501@gmx.de>
References: <CAA4WUYj3VY+50Wt2RP-WGv=xcUjBPDmcdfwWuig-CweSW1Nk1w@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbczaxA405=PzRVRaSNHZQwbp3h_5=tHojzK7xoqqmDsGQ@mail.gmail.com> <51777949.2000501@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:37:34 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tc5cv1eWQvI-F8Jg41eijMCD78A
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYg1Ry1K+1pCh11dFMMV=fSRdPduSRK4oobWgBNx4txTig@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd766aab0558c04db1589bc
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkMThAXTO/FgJES/SqyN1eK/F0HwHrY09UzRLyNspdpez45Tc/QyLGZRdmXCHVczSPqKQPnj7exQoDDWUI9piHj+VBJfLoqQY7vB+0SLkKXjcCNF+qISo6xUTFFGe7qT11C/vee4ANIRtzFRrLWbt9hXuj5Z/HKfQc1YhgsxUAZ0rwluUFx4Ti+Q8QPEkKiL6nxZGXO
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.178; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qc0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UUtL9-0004K3-8z e4bf58e761198b95501c691e60d37a03
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: what's up with commenting on http/2 github issues
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYg1Ry1K+1pCh11dFMMV=fSRdPduSRK4oobWgBNx4txTig@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17526
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:

> On 2013-04-24 07:29, James M Snell wrote:
>
>> I'm rather wondering the same thing. I've chimed in a bit over there
>> but would much rather have the discussion here; however, I'm also
>>
>
> We talked about this during the last WG meeting; IMHO any discussion that
> leads to protocol changes (beyond editorial) needs to happen here.
>

That's what I recall, but there are definitely some design discussions
happening in Github.


>
>  concerned about flooding the list with too much traffic. In the past
>> few days I've seen a ton of notes post from Mark about a broad variety
>> of issues (editorial and otherwise) that I'm simply not sure how to
>> respond to effectively.
>> ...
>>
>
> Indeed, but that's because Mark does what we all should be doing - doing
> WGLC reviews. We'll just need to handle the back log carefully and see that
> we finish 1.1 as soon as possible.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>