IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 23 June 2020 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E9B3A0C28 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=gyMSwmfr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=THdznsmv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8deCJWuLbmr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E393A0C27 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jns1Z-0004fx-9f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:08:17 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:08:17 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jns1Z-0004fx-9f@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>) id 1jns1X-0004fC-UG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:08:15 +0000
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mt@lowentropy.net>) id 1jns1W-0006cT-E5 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:08:15 +0000
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCDE5C00DC; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:08:02 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=4F jX09fQ+Mpm2kdSZS8/+xcNH6c1RwZHu8Z/qkCoR0c=; b=gyMSwmfrgZnc+bHlmw XlQ2bFHdZZFED3skmYNT0/1H4LuRKxw46fYMI92TjNVYqPfku1yaMp7f9WzRJa3s CxTSRmZQLeojJPTrRmzrOoooF8vPvC2z+Sn5vzlc4nH2GSvhr+XxDNHPL8OzlVZ9 YVNwHPfr7dbFESMgir3+gua0I6PphNdDSdzllmOc9xkpAg+qvOHiAvOVOoA42RP7 b/wBFwnUR6QLWfFhykd8Ry0lxus8owPTuKKvOALFz4dWoalsWT0EbSTFba0hTLio 3KANk+dkGdXvuyKI5IXJ+xtfQ8Uk2reJTJCJXQN37JRSU2N5imeE4XP2XKbDE9xf +h7g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=4FjX09fQ+Mpm2kdSZS8/+xcNH6c1RwZHu8Z/qkCoR 0c=; b=THdznsmv1bqtMDeNNzLaYilhus2I49u64h1km1spKP3h7iAxpuLAZRsjN Q3NSAxzlG+xA/jIExN8fmIOQpHeHJ3pxSlqMJb+bG+CA81o1P29KEvekA0CCQRI6 cE+5UymNubvuTjwdTBQTP5U2FOhl4QvS6BaZtc8xOcyEw8dCJWv1HY9tuISgUVtW Vcvr4Hvelzcz1hufciHucFNpLHysId/4NelZ8FVK+PgyyOOUd0tihoi9Uz89X+X7 uqwYX12vJNJWroDn2ap4W1+zzpQbF6c3hD2cB/MXnXTbOaR+N8JbTPBXbYzgJKYO KTN7wKbSb2yciOF1tWVDc1hkY7ugQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:UovyXjJS49r9L9aXRITx7IpzV46NlT1UljmPbytpuXZ2pKZpe5Lqsg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekiedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgjeeuudeiffeltdegleehjedvtedtjeduudehgfegfefgkefg ueeiteegffdttdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:UovyXnIHsdiwGwlH71Q_Cy1fLDJo13OUo1qCOvF__FGG0-27SW2GNA> <xmx:UovyXrvviADL3RQ4OtAcoRl99qYSb2gdX5obWCycKVCprMBYd9fe0w> <xmx:UovyXsaA97BqMAtg5ESR_sTV3WTlRZg25-R_RONIC2UVHM1Ep7XXkQ> <xmx:UovyXjkR5eIrOBRR75RtCreIPuzi-1AlBkb0KqrRda44Pa7I1H32Yw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 82789E00A8; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-543-gda70334-fm-20200618.004-gda703345
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8b0819d5-8a49-4a9b-b8f2-56b8fc4c93bd@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE7C0812-720D-4598-93FC-E641D0888C7A@apple.com>
References: <159199313530.13520.7556914670094066150@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKC-DJgGoPirEoRW=E2qvYnsgx8s7Zyni=YxJEZNLMmTagwNMQ@mail.gmail.com> <00397886-f3b3-4788-b4c9-e64055802131@www.fastmail.com> <EE7C0812-720D-4598-93FC-E641D0888C7A@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:44 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=mt@lowentropy.net; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jns1W-0006cT-E5 af95ab45b4029b79bf6a90a91e519ac3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/8b0819d5-8a49-4a9b-b8f2-56b8fc4c93bd@www.fastmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37816
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, at 00:29, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Regarding the done-ness and implementations, I agree that this 
> certainly isn’t as mature as QUIC. The key thing at this time is 
> getting the wire format stable enough to do the RR type early 
> allocation, 

I think that it is time to start this part.  Unless others agree with me regarding the size of the priority field, that is.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email