Last Call for Comments: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis (BCP 190 update)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 23:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8341207FC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDKQbGNwZ_k6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041FC120019 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iKWem-0006Tl-T5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:55:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:55:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iKWem-0006Tl-T5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1iKWel-0006Sf-AV for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:55:11 +0000
Received: from raven-v6.nostrum.com ([2001:470:d:1130::1] helo=nostrum.com) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1iKWei-0005H2-J9 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:55:10 +0000
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x9FNsw4s074238 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:55:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1571183705; bh=qccM11TtOO5V+sfxM5S+aQ+EN+gBlDDZ07SuZdy1fpw=; h=To:Cc:Reply-To:From:Subject:Date; b=XjJ1UTDw8CJlX0xnQJ20k71NEl1wxsTILHlJX4zTkNyThJO08JKQcUtPwblCNzJoI 41Tu02lOfTyFy6hHUvgAVkDioBijQrS9+//KBNL5Xi6KWiNLm+cYHi0N7TfKwi8oB7 a8lVD3HNQ9JwiqxM29NZxy4QvaP8JQwTe+UAlWHM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "art-ads@ietf.org" <art-ads@ietf.org>
Reply-To: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cdeb0612-89bd-ae70-a7c3-a769d07e5f4c@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=2001:470:d:1130::1; envelope-from=adam@nostrum.com; helo=nostrum.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iKWei-0005H2-J9 c4668eb0bbd03e96241a995f1ecc77a1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Last Call for Comments: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis (BCP 190 update)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/cdeb0612-89bd-ae70-a7c3-a769d07e5f4c@nostrum.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37056
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
ART community (cc DISPATCH and HTTPBIS, but please respond only to ART): Based on conversations on the DISPATCH and ART mailing lists this past summer [1], and on in-person discussions that took place in Montreal, Mark Nottingham has produced a revision of BCP 190 that takes into account community input on several points. The changes are all intended to be relaxations of previously-enforced restrictions on how URI namespaces could be used. The revised document is at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis/ And diffs from the current, in-force version of BCP 190 can be seen here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc7320&url2=draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02 This message is intended to serve as a final, two-week last call for input from the ART community before the document is put forth for formal IETF consensus. The final consensus document will be published as a replacement of RFC 7320 (formally, it will obsolete it), and will become the new BCP 190. Please provide input on the document on the ART mailing list (art@ietf.org) by Wednesday, October 30th. To prevent the conversation from becoming fragmented, please do not respond to the HTTPBIS or DISPATCH mailing lists on this topic. Thanks! /a ____ [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=bcp%20190&f_list=art%2Cdispatch