Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Tue, 13 September 2022 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA733C1526FB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 02:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CfQ4xoNIZ5P5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 02:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15C26C1522CB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 02:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1oY2Ec-002Qxg-Gb for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:29:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:29:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1oY2Ec-002Qxg-Gb@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1oY2Ea-002QwY-Jq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:29:36 +0000
Received: from mail2.greenbytes.de ([5.10.171.186] helo=mail.greenbytes.de) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1oY2EZ-00ESDz-4r for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:29:36 +0000
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 119) id 66ABE9816B9; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:17:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.179] (unknown [91.61.59.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20EF5980A9F; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:17:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4fdb5108-3f95-b58a-d258-ee609ed29078@greenbytes.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:29:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, tpauly@apple.com
Cc: james.synge@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20220831154236.C5540AB20A@rfcpa.amsl.com> <868d91de-6e0a-4573-b7bf-50e59606e51a@greenbytes.de>
In-Reply-To: <868d91de-6e0a-4573-b7bf-50e59606e51a@greenbytes.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.10.171.186; envelope-from=julian.reschke@greenbytes.de; helo=mail.greenbytes.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.628, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1oY2EZ-00ESDz-4r a0b1c99ea60f33179b29d8c2c3c90e9e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7107)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/4fdb5108-3f95-b58a-d258-ee609ed29078@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40388
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 31.08.2022 um 17:48 schrieb Julian Reschke:
> Am 31.08.2022 um 17:42 schrieb RFC Errata System:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110,
>> "HTTP Semantics".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7107
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: James Synge <james.synge@gmail.com>
>>
>> Section: 6.5.1
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
>> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
>> (Section 7.1.2 of [HTTP/1.1]).
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1
>> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content
>> (Section ?.?.? of [HTTP/1.1]).
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Section 7.1.2 does not exist. It isn't clear to me which section is 
>> the intended target of the reference.
>> ...
> 
> It does exist. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112#section-7.1.2>.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Dear RFC Editor,

could you please close this erratum as "rejected"?

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782