Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F813A0DB3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNB54MU8PgQf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A4243A0CB5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jiqAP-0004JF-5y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:08:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:08:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jiqAP-0004JF-5y@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1jiqAN-00048Q-FE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:08:35 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1jiqAL-0003pZ-FB for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:08:35 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id x13so436972wrv.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iVswJkyv/RAqcaEx9aZCWfkY7eA3nos+EosxmLtoQaM=; b=Ah0UzS2rDghSZojjUd+uv1l8Wxi+1w3DRJa7ijtLsxCa6Sp5zhHcNp2+YALhPJcsXo vBWxGla5uAaKrhgQkMjOM3v9/Ff60sC4PzsN3PLvn6/wPanXuaj4NyBXMkA/K21DzjDi wxaYBw00GzlKk8OcGG3B2xazZYOJ5VBZCHDsmWJFInwJnUfqcXTjMo+WjS1/D2VNqHbi LQ0Mn8zor1LREAQBYyQ/WwejfwBykQjendzLZnnKHrGZtxvkm6CIwbsZmmHE4vIQBZAo Zf0jdJ3Wi99KSpegutcQVSjEU7SBL6HQ5/FC4c8cWOIETEfJx9QbUvbg0PUVkddV5mDf J//g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iVswJkyv/RAqcaEx9aZCWfkY7eA3nos+EosxmLtoQaM=; b=WcbF/z9H/bhxCH1thtDR1Px7yCVkiUG4Gp/iYscCwkPilECFsuYbEnFIWzkiZEV4Ay OjT0hkcYkIs9TRrZzl9zpNEu80le9rUBIGspRLy3TzbjvhW2Ipbnma//8TepRbTxX1ob 6P+ecVKzLwqlgAcsXnypOBx3+yz1lqjScgSc0rRlos90agGBnXH8wpaecZa4LC91eYWu IuDwglDOEy+UbyByXeKrQrXArh3z93aWgePK7YFYA/LpwXE5wr/Y/z+Uci8+HkZGlcpo CJ0AdrE4XeONEpL829xufKx7Z17Theg8VAVNihlnN2jq8DnFuC/oNHZelZfTCzeb8dji XSCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zCawn/A3Ukhe81NjmDiP8LsjKBsivrSkICbp+xqbcqeeb4jjq v5T6Ckyws7KNsrDvhDt3aHqH9opcv3VzopSuoxVXen02
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAsRtT0JYnzDjpdDtk09jZAzGsEb7Xrhu0umUfVTNbU7s0s74DmPjHW+A6MDzrzReVRBQR0+H9non/P9Ixy/4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a04:: with SMTP id m4mr907385wrq.153.1591754901521; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oZ9u=huobnQig0mMPS=-Fu7Mu3q8GHLTBOxd2W5u0h_kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oZ9u=huobnQig0mMPS=-Fu7Mu3q8GHLTBOxd2W5u0h_kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:08:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ-MzUh6JZrM7w97i=64OEZ3JzjzhVir2RBTWm210Fw7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079877205a7b151ca"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jiqAL-0003pZ-FB ec353f3323cb057a91407c8ff5140152
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oZ-MzUh6JZrM7w97i=64OEZ3JzjzhVir2RBTWm210Fw7w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37744
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello folks,

Please see the forwarded Working Group Last Call announcement for the QUIC
protocol drafts.

The QUIC WG will only consider feedback directed towards it so please do
not respond to this thread. Instead, review comments need to be opened on
the GitHub repo or sent to the QUIC mailing list as described in the
guidance below.

Cheers,
Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:36 AM
Subject: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>


Hello,

After more than three and a half years and substantial discussion, all 845
of the design issues raised against the QUIC protocol drafts have gained
consensus or have a proposed resolution. In that time the protocol has been
considerably transformed; it has become more secure, much more widely
implemented, and has been shown to be interoperable. Both the Chairs and
the Editors feel that it is ready to proceed in standardisation.

Therefore, this email announces a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for the
following QUIC documents:

* QUIC Transport
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-29

* QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-recovery-29

* Using TLS to Secure QUIC
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-tls-29

* Version-Independent Properties of QUIC
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-invariants-09

* HTTP/3
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-http-29

* QPACK Header Compression for HTTP/3
  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-qpack-16

The WGLC will run for four weeks, ending on 8 July 2020.

As a reminder, we have been operating under the Late-Stage Process; see
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#late-stage-process.
In theory, this means that the contents of the drafts above already have
consensus. However, the Chairs would like to actively reaffirm that
consensus and start the process of wider review through a formal WGLC.

Please review the documents above and open issues for your review comments
in our repository at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts. You may also
send comments to quic@ietf.org.

Issues raised during WGLC will be handled in accordance with the Late-Stage
Process defined in the Contribution Guidelines (see link above). Please
note that design issues that revisit a topic where there's already declared
consensus (see
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+label%3Ahas-consensus)
need to provide compelling reasons to warrant reopening the discussion.

As part of this WGLC, we seek consensus on the remaining open design issue
#3661 “Include epoch in the AAD or the nonce?” (
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3661). The proposed resolution
for this issue is to close with no action, which means that the drafts
above already reflect this emerging consensus.

Subject to the feedback received during this WGLC, a subsequent smaller
WGLC may be run in the near future to confirm any changes to the drafts
made between now and then.

The Applicability and Manageability drafts have some dependencies on the
core drafts, so we'll run separate WGLCs for them.

Cheers,

Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs