IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Tue, 07 October 2014 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4151A913F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfwYmrdG6y65 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 23:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B771A1B17 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 23:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XbOZn-0007Nm-Ta for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:48:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:48:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XbOZn-0007Nm-Ta@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1XbOZk-0007MZ-Rp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:48:48 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1XbOZj-00072k-Cs for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:48:48 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.97] (unknown [203.184.52.78]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF9CE71CA for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:48:14 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <54338CA8.9030305@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:48:08 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <CA+pLO_jkN67HLT7oup+FcYVY+RZ7ckhpY2gGy=TAsr2UUMnVVA@mail.gmail.com> <987FB86A-EF8B-4CD1-A9A7-52A9163E8CB3@mnot.net> <54334615.40907@iij.ad.jp> <CAH_y2NGuRBeN=_NJExeFqt06Uq5MAdYHpAp2xhiFKj0AE1wcJQ@mail.gmail.com> <0BB64E69-463C-4D12-8582-FD1FF84D1B10@mnot.net> <20141007052847.GA11117@1wt.eu> <B47FA4E6-6F91-44A1-8257-AE5086EF4DC1@mnot.net> <20141007054917.GB4566@1wt.eu> <28897143-3030-4500-829A-4199CE17CA22@mnot.net> <20141007061650.GD4566@1wt.eu> <C2C61B19-E738-4B90-BE0F-A4346C095FA4@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <C2C61B19-E738-4B90-BE0F-A4346C095FA4@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.500, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XbOZj-00072k-Cs 064ee45cd17c335500a048ebb3fde55b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54338CA8.9030305@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27478
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/10/2014 7:26 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Thanks, Willy.
> 
> Everyone, please extend the straw poll to include these two options
> -- who prefers one of them as the solution?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On 7 Oct 2014, at 5:16 pm, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 

<snip>

>> The second one was much simpler and Greg seems to favor it as
>> well :
>> 
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.http-wg/23201
>> 

If that level of change is going to be accepted I prefer this one.
With h2-14 draft text as second choice.

Notice that this design allows for parallel experimentation on the
static table contents, with a slightly larger static table size. So
the WG can switch in a new static table in a later draft without
affecting anybodies coded logic or algorithms.

Amos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJUM4ynAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjOFcH+KDfvlw4w7/3NBw3EMgSIAZN
syMe8QO15UU3QxZ6a20wCQMaN3Jq3VnwCmqqgqegB39paTnMyHcVNX46lRDQj8zC
3TiiWI89FadALv1+LICUJPZnQSYCYUTchhntMNHuFWJ+2HzBzmIiRcQX2VT/8R/R
8Sy+AFkHhfDLh+yo6+KkdDe9dGNINRz5l0vlBJ+QvIsUrdj5K56Gxbro/y5ubTCr
W2vXsii/LKwLcDoQ8eaX/5S8CCVLTes0CjCPnZoMqiIJQOicLXEJyM15Ue4dtV2l
SLD8atNRbAE5yAYLYcbjG0MMER9gGUPyUm+9HhToAkgaUg39mYKShijPMTNCsA==
=BnM8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status